Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-05-21

2020-05-23 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> > there's apparently some options to disable the .pyc cache files: > See 4e124fd1409af419990bacade74fcf355624243f . --tml ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] make check / dbgutil performance ...

2015-06-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
my gut feeling is that the 'has to compile on the notebook that I take aorund the world'-requirement is more one from sponsored developers, while our volunteer contributors often do their compiles at home on a desktop machine ... Exactly the opposite here. I do paid work on my desktop

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Presentation Video Bug - Need Dev/QA Feedback

2014-06-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
For MacOSX I wonder if Tor knows of a basic/built-in video viewer on MacOSX which uses the same route we are using to render video which can be used as an example program to compare against to filter out missing codecs vs libreoffice-side bustate ? No idea. I would just double-click on the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Presentation Video Bug - Need Dev/QA Feedback

2014-06-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
The few movie files I have on my Mac are taken with my Canon DSLR, named *.mov, encoded in H.264 I think, and open with QuickTime Player. One of those files was the one I successfully inserted in a Writer doc when I tested the recent Mac patches to avmedia. --tml

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2013-11-18 Thread Tor Lillqvist
It's unclear how much harm if any that did to us here ? ;-) OK, not then. --tml ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2013-11-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
+ turn on mergedlibs LTO for Windows - any objections ? (Michael) Jesús already replied about the LTO bit, thanks for reviewing. As for --enable-mergelibs, it doesn't look good. Apparently that has never been tried for Windows? Or at least not recently? The option has a help message which

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2013-11-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
This once again shows how harmful it is to have tons of configuration options. And before somebody else replies but you have yourself introduced several 'experimental' configuration options: Sure I need to be re-educated. --tml ___ List Name:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC4 test builds available for smoketesting

2013-07-24 Thread Tor Lillqvist
yeah! ask them (developers) to give you back your money. I have a fairly complete log, but I cannot find such exchange in libreoffice-dev That sounds exactly as something I would say, so I can volunteer as the culprit here! What do I win, a ban from the channel? --tml

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-11-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
+ packaging upgraded python for Mac (Cloph) + Tor has built it, packaging issues pending No I have not (if this means the new python3 directory). It did *seem* that something got built, maybe all of it that should be built, but anyway then the gbuild tried to copy

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Java 7 support in LO 3.4.5 (was: minutes of tech. steering call ...)

2011-12-09 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I'm new to this QA system, but wouldn't it be useful to know when (date/time) this was added? Added where? You need to realise that we use a *distributed* version control system, git, and time stamps are not important, as far as I understand it. Sure, in our case there are central repositories

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Java 7 support in LO 3.4.5 (was: minutes of tech. steering call ...)

2011-12-09 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I'm interest in the time a change was committed to the central repository by a developer But developers don't commit to the central repository. They commit to their local clones of it, and then at some (much) later stage push outstanding commits to the central repository. And then there are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Naming builds. Please???

2011-12-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I thought Andras was referring to the single 8 letter/number code added to the Windows install folder name. Where does that come from? No need to know. It is just a random (or not so random) sequence of hex digits. If nothing documents it to have some significance, don't assume it to have any