Xisco Faulí wrote
> Hi all,
> Do you think it would be plausible to have a link in bugzilla's menu to
> quickly check the issues assign to oneself like the link 'My bugs'? Right
> now, the only way I found to check this is in 'Advanced Search' - Custom
> Search - Assignee equals to 'user' which IM
Tommy wrote
> Hi there,
> is there any way we can obtain a Bugzilla query showing a list with the
> bugs with the highest duplicates number?
> [...]
> I think knowing the list of the most duplicated bug reports would help
> QA members to identify more duplicates once they are reported.
> is this
Robinson Tryon wrote
> We've been discussing using the guided mechanism within Bugzilla
> since... a couple years ago? Now that we've migrated, this is a real
> possibility.
> [...]
> Indeed, indeed. The Guided forms are definitely something that we're
> currently investigating. If you'd like to he
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Sure. That's us running into the limitations of Bugzilla, really.
> [...]
> Bugzilla isn't quite that customizable.
Hi!
Disagree. It is only the way how this project use (or rather not use)
Bugzilla features.
To solve the issues mentioned I would propose using flags.
Robi
jmadero wrote
> I also suggest that people join the bugzilla mailing list. People over
> there are quite helpful and it would be good to start probing them to
> see how to begin to implement these changes :)
Hi!
For all who want to start hacking TDF Bugzilla here is a list of useful
links:
- https
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
> He/She might reappear possibly though now that this
> is "our" Bugzilla: e.g. for bug hunting sessions.
Those have hunter walrus
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/4/44/Bughuntban4.4.png).
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
jmadero wrote
> and try to figure out how that
> page is generated. I triedcouldn't find it for the life of me :-/
Hi!
It is quite easy - it is implemented as Extension. The page template is
extensions/WeeklyBugSummary/template/en/default/pages/weekly-bug-summary.html.tmpl.
The code with SQL q
Hi!
Shouldn't it be stable-walrus and not lab-walrus? All went fine with the
migration.
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-that-walrus-tp4137990p4138131.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi!
Great work, thanks to all for smooth migration. FDO's Bugzilla server at
idle from now on ;).
Best regards.
BTW: does FDO admin accounts are lowered in permissions at our instance?
Anyone audited admin groups?
Time to clean the database from FDO leftovers (keywords, unrelated series,
etc.).
Hi!
I hope that migrated FDO Bugzilla 4.4.5 will be promptly upgraded to 4.4.7
released on 21st of January (security update).
Also I hope that a test version using Bugzilla 5.0rc1 will be set up as this
version will be released in 2015 and have many new features - REST
interface, API keys, ability
Hi!
From the rr 3.0 release notes -
http://robert.ocallahan.org/2014/12/rr-30-released-with-x86-64-support.html:
> [...]
> - Many bug fixes to broaden the range of recordable applications. E.g.
> LibreOffice and QEMU work now.
I am unfortunately unable to test this tool ATM, so maybe anyone wor
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> LibreOffice does have a ton of bugs, but I'm not sure when we'd need
> to display more than 10,000 bugs in a particular list. Got a specific
> use-case in mind?
New is at 8336 now, so probably will break this limit sooner than later.
Anyway, I just want to display all
Hi!
I checked the params file today in gerrit, some notes*:
- 'max_search_results' => '1' - could you please change (or disable this
limit) as LO product have more bugs (at least for testing)
- 'ssl_redirect' => 0, and 'sslbase' => '', - I would change it to https
only for obvious reasons - thi
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:53 PM, bfoman <
> bfo.bugmail@
> > wrote:
>> You just need to run collectstats.pl --regenerate.
> Let's see... that took about 9 minutes.
So it could take 30 minutes when done in 2015 for more than 30k LO bugs..
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> I'm not sure if the software is set up to regenerate historical data.
> Do you know?
> I'll add this to the list of items to request from the FDO admins
> (https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/936).
> If my guess is right, then regeneration w/o the old data is n
Hi!
Quoting from two messages..
Robinson Tryon wrote
>> - change password link works, but as Base URL is not configured, so there
>> are no working links in the change password message
> Yeah, sorry [...] I'll try to get vm144 put back together by tonight.
Fixed.
Robinson Tryon wrote
>> - Old
Hi!
I used this old-new test install and checked the control points I added to
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:QA/Bugzilla/TDF_Bugzilla_Proposal
- change password link works, but as Base URL is not configured, so there
are no working links in the change password message
- Old Chart syste
Hi!
I used this test install some more and checked the control points I added to
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:QA/Bugzilla/TDF_Bugzilla_Proposal:
- Old Chart system doesn't work - as I wrote earlier seems data dir was not
copied or copied and permissions are wrong
- New Charts - data is
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> The goal of this test install is for us to verify that it can operate
> in the same fashion as Bugzilla running on FDO. Because email is used
> so heavily in the bug tracker, I think it would be a huge burden to
> try to test if we shunted the bugmail to a file. Do you h
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Yes, passwords should be invalidated.
Could you please confirm it? I couldn't check it by myself.
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Bugmail is currently enabled for regular user accounts.
> I've added a warning message asking
> people to try to avoid heavily-spamming people who
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Full meeting minutes and agenda:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/November_05
> http://pumbaa.documentfoundation.org/meetbot/libreoffice-qa/2014/libreoffice-qa.2014-11-05-18.44.html
> 19:24:14
>
> Right now we have some old bugzilla data we're using
Hi!
Today I stumbled upon rr - lightweight recording & deterministic debugging
tool.
More infos at http://rr-project.org, source https://github.com/mozilla/rr.
This potentially could be great tool for developers to debug. Just imagine
that .rr file is attached to bug report and dev simply downloa
jmadero wrote
> andI'm an idiot who used a bad query so now the results are going to
> suck. Dammit.
> Joel (annoyed with myself)
Hi!
You should change your default columns and add Changed and Number of
comments. This way you will see on Change Several Bugs at Once page when the
bugs have
Tommy wrote
> we currently have 799 UNCONFIRMED and 7793 NEW bugs.
> I think that there should be a consistent number of those who did not
> receive any new comment in the last 6 months.
> [...]
> meanwhile, so please retest with current LibO release (4.3.2.2) and give
> feedback of the actual
jphilipz wrote
> Hi bfoman,
> I'm assuming it rolled out yesterday or so, as since yesterday i've been
> having difficulties loading large pages in bugzilla as they are not
> fully loading in my browser of choice (opera).
Hi!
You can try to set Browser identification as IE (
Hi!
Important news for users and those planning Bugzilla migration - fdo
Bugzilla have been upgraded to latest 4.4.5 version!
Please read about new features available -
http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/4.4.5/release-notes.html#v44_feat
The upgrade to next stable branch of Bugzilla with a lot of new
Urmas D. wrote
> Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
> Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay
> Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which
> I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over;
> but than
Hi!
>From my experience asking for an example file is the best way to triage for
following reasons:
- saves time - you can download the attachment and check it in different
builds right away - important with current backlog in Unconfirmed bugs
- reproducible case - sometimes when you follow the STR
jphilipz wrote
> I would love to know how to use symchk.exe to download all needed
> symbols for offline usage, as i have noticed a few times that the
> analysis would take quite a bit of time to complete and assumed it was
> going online searching for what it needed. I hope it doesnt take a huge
>
jphilipz wrote
> How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg - what i just updated, so its pretty
> much perfect in my eyes :), but will still polish it up in the next day.
> I plan to also do a video as an update to this one <
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fppBTs215yc >, which will be short and
> concis
jphilipz wrote
> the duplicates link on the wiki page wouldnt be a beneficial resource to
> point users to who had such issues, as it would require them to do alot
> of reading, and the point of the wiki page is to provide summaries and
> possible solutions.
Hi!
A lot of reading - good, maybe the
jphilipz wrote
> Hi All,
> After commenting on over 300 bugs in the last month, i have noticed a
> number of duplicated bugs that i plan to write up a wiki page for, so it
> will be easy for us to point users to who submit reports that are
> already known. Of course it will never replace AskLibo.co
Cor Nouws wrote
> I know, since I am part of the battle against a considerable workload
> caused by duplicate issues and 'help-requests' (thanks to BSA..).
> Hence my suggestion: in a reported bug, add a button that starts a query
> based on the summary of that issue, not necessarily the component,
Hi!
Having saved queries against crash/dataloss/perf etc. items gives bugs on
your radar without the need of checking Major/Critical, Summary or comments.
It is easier to be alarmed and IMHO such Whiteboard items could be used
more.
Also you can chart them against time in series.
Best regards.
Michael Meeks-5 wrote
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:07 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> Ok, this viciously Canonical/Ubuntu branded, but its 10xi5 and it fits on
>> a
>> plane in a Pelican box:
> Looks cool to me =) to what degree would Canonical be willing to
> sponsor / loan those ? [ it see
jmadero wrote
> The € 3000 is for the migration itself not for administering it once it
> is setup.
Hi!
OMG.
Anyway who will administer the own instance? I am asking because every
custom change in Bugzilla will have to be done pretty much manually whether
it is a change in the perl code (any perl
jmadero wrote
> So we're getting really into the planning stages of our own instance of
> bugzilla. That being said we are compiling a list of requests that could
> improve how users/devs/and QA interact with it. If you have any ideas
> feel free to add:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Pro
Michael Stahl-2 wrote
> definitely a problem, but i think it's a pretty fundamental limitation:
> bugzilla simply has no concept of branches.
Hi!
Bugzilla branch support (called sightings):
- progress - follow https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55970
- code -
http://git.mozilla.org/?p=bu
ape wrote
> Hi Pedro!
> I have good news about Windows XP:
> http://www.ubuntukylin.com/news/shownews.php?lang=en&id=191
> Microsoft announced to extend deadline of Windows XP security update
> Service to July 14, 2015:
> News from Microsoft and other majority of IT media: Windows XP security
> upd
jmadero wrote
> Yes but we need to decide a couple things:
> 1) is moving to a single list (or two) static lists best?
> 2) Should we just hold off until our own bug tracker is set up because
> then the MAB will hopefully be no longer needed as we'll just use
> priority/severity and lock them.
> I
Hi!
Offtopic - as 4.0 is EOLed shouldn't its MAB be CLOSED FIXED soon? Probably
most bugs to reconfirm and migrate to MAB 4.1 (or MAB even).
It is hard to accept any MAB limit, especially when MAB 4.0 depends on 52
open bugs, MAB 4.1 depends on 37 open bugs and MAB depends on 19 open bugs.
108 ope
Samuel Mehrbrodt-2 wrote
> Thanks.
> Is there already a 4.3 MAB meta bug?
> I guess this should be added there.
Hi!
If I am not mistaken there won't be any per branch MABs anymore. This MAB
was probably created as a single meta bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 (it has some st
1476p4092722.html
This email was sent by bfoman (via Nabble)
To receive all replies by email, subscribe to this discussion:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=subscribe_by_code&node=4091476&code=bGlicmVvZmZpY2UtcWFAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub
Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote
> * Completed Action Items:
> + test & document windows debug symbol server (QA guys?)
> http://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/symstore/symbols/
> [ Cloph uploading RC2 symbols, and also the source server! - so
> sources will be available
> in the deb
V Stuart Foote wrote
> I prefer running the SysInternals ProcessMonitor (v3.0.5) to fully log ALL
> system processes during a crash. And with access now to the LibreOffice
> symbols we can follow process and threads with stack traces exposed with
> the symbols Debug Help dbghelp.dll from the Windo
sophi wrote
>> We've been using CamelCase tags with some success. What about
>> NeedsHelpFile? (NeedsDocumentation ?)
>
> I would like to ask the developers to open an issue each time a help text
> is
> needed for a feature, or each time a help text needs to be modified to
> reflect the feature c
Pedro wrote
> As I have mentioned several times during Alpha development (and never got
> any answer, as usual) the 4.2 installer under Windows no longer offers the
> option to select which Modules to install during a Custom install.
> Was this a TDF decision or is this a bug?
Hi!
This is explaine
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
> Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some
> "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the symbol server to get
> pdb files for debugging the release builds.
Hi!
This is a great news and IMHO big milestone for this project. Hope
delivering sym
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Either that, or we figure out a different way to indicate that we want
> information from the OP or from one of the other commenters/cc'd
> individuals on the bug. That might require some investment of
> implementation time...
Hi!
You can do it by using needinfo extension us
Robinson Tryon wrote
>> Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1
>> The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the
>> bug-reporter. But with setting it to "NEEDINFO" (There is asked for a
>> better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed.
>
> well that is weird!
Michael Meeks-5 wrote
> * Symbols for Windows releases (Markus)
> + Kendy's tinderbox is now providing the symbols (Kendy)
> +
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/symbols/
> + We need it for release builds (Markus)
> [...]
> + provide it but not f
Norbert Thiebaud wrote
> that is what bibisect repo are for.
> downloading 100 to 200MB per iteration is not a nice solution for anyone.
> bibsect repo are bigger to start with.. so the initial setup is
> slower... but after that the bisection can be done completely offline
> I do not have data for
Hi!
Apart from availability of daily builds is it possible to increase the
storage space available for tinderbox builds? Seems currently only 14 latest
builds of each branch are available (when all works like expected). This
doesn't allow to think about building any regression/bisect script/tool
(b
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> Bjoern I think that is where I think a centralized LDAP repository. if
> LDAP
> is currently in use then the user migration shouldnt be a problem at all.
Hi!
LDAP authentication is supported in Bugzilla. Which unique Redmine features
you are thinking about?
Apart per pro
Hi!
Anyone could resurrect Windows Daily Debug builds with symbols? Tinderbox
Win-x86@6-debug is still unavailable. Those builds are necessary to deliver
valid backtraces on Windows platform, and as we can see, there are potential
volunteers who can help to get them for Windows crashers.
Thanks in
Rob Snelders-3 wrote
> We want to start tracking statistics of bugs over time.
Hi!
You can find BSA series in Bugzilla's Reports>New
chart>Libreoffice>Stats>BSA which counts bugs with BSA whiteboard or define
your own (if you are not interested in historical data) - more infos at
https://bugs.fre
Robinson Tryon wrote
>> - consider sending out explanation before, during and after the migration
>> to
>> all LO product reporters, people on cc lists
> I think notification before the migration is prudent, but I'm hesitant
> to send them emails both during and after migration, as they might
> per
Hi!
I would propose to:
- search for fulltime Bugzilla administrator and his deputies before
migration - they will be responsible for updating and managing installation
- consider sending out explanation before, during and after the migration to
all LO product reporters, people on cc lists
- draft
sophi wrote
> Just to let you know, I've taken this from the minute 'Every bug on the
> MAB should be tested at least every minor release'
> and I'm currently testing them against the last 4.1.3 (when I can, no
> Mac or Windows at home) and commented the bugs.
> Hope this helps.
Hi.
Hope this is a
Pedro wrote
> My experience is that I don't mind being contacted back if I report a bug
> but I won't register into yet another site just to report a bug (unless I
> start to use the bugged program regularly)
Hi!
Many bugs are reported by users who forgot about their reports. When asked
to provide
Pedro wrote
> My opinion: Users should report bugs in a user friendly page that doesn't
> require registration.
> One example: The Mozilla feedback page
> https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback
Hi!
As someone already mentioned bugzilla.mozilla.org is the proper bug tracking
site for all Mozilla
Rob Snelders-3 wrote
> Hi Tollef,
> We have a problem with a aggressive user on bugzilla. Can you remove the
> bug he made as well as the user?
> The bug is 70636 and the user is "Fuck Registration"
Hi!
...and you think it is over? Looking at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70651 he
bfoman wrote
> Great, so now you can test a bunch of useful extensions enabled on
> bugzilla.mozilla.org:
> http://bzr.mozilla.org/bmo/4.0/files/head:/extensions/
> I really like My product dashboard or /page.cgi?id=triage_reports.html
> search page
I am sorry - corr
Robinson Tryon wrote
> I think that primary Bugzilla sources live in Bazaar [...] of Bugzilla in
> git.
Hi!
Bazaar development is discontinued, so probably Bugzilla will be available
at github quite soon.
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Test install of Bugzilla 4.2.3 (to match what's running on FDO) is h
Hi!
Some comments:
-No default assingie (If no one is assigned, then no one is assigned - so
easy to understand)
This is mandatory field in Bugzilla. Anyway, default assignee allows to
watch new bugs filed in components - whether by mailinglist or by watching
special account (like compon...@libre
Florian Reisinger wrote
> You meant "Directly to a new instance"? I fear we are not allowed to do
> this, because of privacy issues...
Hi!
So lets check bugs.freedesktop.org, www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla,
www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/, or whatever is the other link to the same
Bugzilla instanc
Robinson Tryon wrote
> 1) Ping our users:
> - Ask our FDO users for permission to include their accounts/data in
> the new install (this could be as simple as a mass-email asking for
> them to reply back to us, or a small Bugzilla plugin where users can
> check a box "Please copy my account to Libr
Petr Mladek wrote
> About 3000 bugs were fixed for LO 4.1 [...] Only small part of them was
> fixed via the MABs process.
Hi!
Code freeze for 4.0.x branch is set to end of October and branch will be
EOLed in November, just in 3-4 months. Migrating 3.6 MABs to 4.0 MAB is like
watching the same movi
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
> The problem there is deduplication and the amounts of channels. Many devs
> do
> not even look at ask, so Im still conflicted on adding mozillas "input"
> thingie, which I assume will be even less read by developers, thus
> possibly
> ending us in a "in space no one can he
Rob Snelders-3 wrote
>> (afaik). And here we are trying to create something new that stands
>> between what we have as bugzilla and the ask-site. Why are we trying
>> to take this hughe detour to get what we want?
Hi!
Well, input is a great page to quick&easy gather feedback and have instant
sta
Florian Reisinger wrote
> What is the preffered way?
> I got:
> -Find a different for master builds
> -Keep the current "master" as debug and download all .pdb files in
> subfolders
Hi!
I think that Windows master debug should be an option for those who can help
debugging crashes according to
http
mariosv wrote
> This broke the use of the LibreOffice Server Installation GUI a great and
> helpful job of Florian Reisinger, that points to the first links.
> I don't know if there is any reason/agreement for this change?
> Can someone turn on the light about it?:)
> Miguel Ángel.
Hi!
There:
http
72 matches
Mail list logo
