Hi Rainer,
well, I didn't know that there were developers focused on specific components;
in this case adding an "accessibility component" won't be the best thing to do,
in my opinion…
> At this point I think we could go for solution C or solution A; in case of
> solution A, would it be possib
Hi Alex,
the bug reporting is described at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
You might be also interested into the bug triage process that is
described at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage
You need to create the account at FreeDesktop bugzilla. It seems that it
does not
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Pá 31. 08. 2012 v 06:36 +0200:
> the advantage of an "Accessibility" Component would be that it can
> easily be selected from a pulldown, no typos or other mistakes can
> happen.But a problem is that an "Accessibility" Component would not
> indicate what developer might b
Hi,
As I've been rather vocal on this issue in the last couple of days in
particular, I'd really like to be in a better position to lend a hand
with any proceedings. Can anyone point me to some docs to look over
for bug reporting in LO? And, does the user account creation
mechanism for the bug r
Hi :)
In bug-reports there are several drop-downs. One has "feature request" and i
think another has "Easy hack"? Would one of those be better than the other?
Which of those was which option of the a, b, c etc?
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Ti tengo d'o
Ti tengo d'occhio schrieb:
in my opinion it would be great to have a component for accessibility;
it could let developers to better focus on accessibility bugs and, on
the other hand, blind people to know that accessibility is important for
this project and that submitting bug reports of this ty
Hi all,
in my opinion it would be great to have a component for accessibility; it could
let developers to better focus on accessibility bugs and, on the other hand,
blind people to know that accessibility is important for this project and that
submitting bug reports of this type is more than en
