Op 18-02-13 17:37, Mirosław Zalewski schreef:
Instead, it would be much better to put more advanced topics on separate pages
(be it one huge "advanced QA topics", or many short pages for every topic
each). First QA page should just contain basic info for beginners and provide
links to pages that
On 16/02/2013 at 21:44, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Fair enough. I was largely suggesting the background color to make it
> easy for beginners to determine what content was written at their
> level. Using some kind of header image or big icon in the sidebar
> could work similarly.
What is the point
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> wrt coloured backgrounds a pale yellow often helps some people with
> dyslexia. So, i kinda like the simplicity of green for users, amber for
> more technical pages or internal pages such as minutes of meetings and then
> perhaps white
Hi all,
Sorry for the wrong empty mail to you only Tom, I was on my phone.
On 16/02/2013 21:18, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :) wrt coloured backgrounds a pale yellow often helps some people
> with dyslexia. So, i kinda like the simplicity of green for users,
> amber for more technical pages or interna
Hi :)
wrt coloured backgrounds a pale yellow often helps some people with dyslexia.
So, i kinda like the simplicity of green for users, amber for more technical
pages or internal pages such as minutes of meetings and then perhaps white
writing on red for devs but i think it could easily get rea
"On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> I like the changes. Actually i prefer
> "someone" to "bug-triager"
> and
> "person" to "developer"
>
> While the more precise definitions are important to us and we might
> 'naturally' understand what the terms ,eam those things might
