>> If you feel good about the beta1 build,
>
>
> My feeling about it is positive. What do others think?
I think that especially for the Windows platform it was an incredible
evolution since a couple of months ago (when it wasn't even possible
to successfully compile) to arrive at this almost stabl
Hi Yifan,
Yifan Jiang wrote (14-12-11 07:46)
1. Thanks for Rimas and Petr's actively participating, what we did in the past
two month to improve the structure of Litmus and now the new stuff is online
and a 3.5.0 beta regression test run is created, in which we are encouraging
people to run the
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (14-12-11 22:12)
first, I am sorry for the late replay. It was another hectic day.
No problem - it's not uncommon that these are hectic times ;-) and it's
great to see the results (what you write about too, and what I see with
the beta1 :-) )
We have beta1 build
Hi Cor,
first, I am sorry for the late replay. It was another hectic day.
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 23:35 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 13:44)
>
> > On the wiki, I added a section with the draft for the later to create
> > separate wiki page:
> > http://wiki.docum
Hi Cor,
I hope I didn't interrupt anything :) But here's some of my comments.
1. Thanks for Rimas and Petr's actively participating, what we did in the past
two month to improve the structure of Litmus and now the new stuff is online
and a 3.5.0 beta regression test run is created, in which we ar
Hi Petr,
Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 13:44)
On the wiki, I added a section with the draft for the later to create
separate wiki page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#DRAFT_for_page_with_info_for_bug-hunting_session
Is it possible for you - without wanting to stres
Cor Nouws wrote (29-11-11 21:36)
Will post more details soon :-)
Ah well, what is soon ;-)
On the wiki, I added a section with the draft for the later to create
separate wiki page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#DRAFT_for_page_with_info_for_bug-hunting_sessio
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 21:36 +0100:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 16:42)
> > Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 15:34 +0100:
> >> Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
>
> >>> Another problem is that we still have only few testcases. We need to
> >>> create more. We still co
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 16:42)
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 15:34 +0100:
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
Another problem is that we still have only few testcases. We need to
create more. We still could do it during the test phase.
Any helping hands are welcome.
I saw
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 15:34 +0100:
> Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
> > Rimas implemented a nice feature yesterday. We are now able to mark some
> > test cases as "language" and/or "OS" dependent. This option affects when
> > the test will be marked as "done" in test run. This way
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
I have added QA and devel mailing lists into CC. We should not cook such
an important event in background.
Agreed - that is why I started at the list initially of course ;-)
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 00:06 +0100:
Is it OK for you if I
Hi Cor,
I have added QA and devel mailing lists into CC. We should not cook such
an important event in background.
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 00:06 +0100:
> Hi Yifan & Petr,
>
> Is it OK for you if I proceed more or less as outlined below?
> I have some additional remarks that I'll take
Hi Pedro,
Pedro Lino wrote (28-11-11 17:32)
I agree with the proposed plans (especially the early testing concept) and the
bug-hunting sessions which are indeed a great idea.
Thanks for this support :-)
I think that the most important aspects are:
1) make sure the dates are quite visible (
Hi all
I agree with the proposed plans (especially the early testing concept) and the
bug-hunting sessions which are indeed a great idea.
I think that the most important aspects are:
1) make sure the dates are quite visible (more so than the prizes)
2) make sure you have at least one person sup
Hi all,
Cor Nouws wrote (19-11-11 16:56)
A test-event, was one of the ideas from the presentation (1), slide #24
Time is running fast, and since the developers (reading the most recent
report of the ESC) did their bits to help us with better QA, I would
like to take a more comprehensive appr
15 matches
Mail list logo
