Hi Joel,
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 22:22 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> Thanks Kohei for your work - I'm sure you're swamped. That being said,
> is there something QA can do to help organize for you? Or is a bug being
> marked a regression against 4.2 sufficient?
Yeah. What you guys have been doing is
On 02/12/2014 07:08 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The amount of Calc regresssions we are dealing with in 4.2.0 is
> overwhelming, and I don't think anyone would deny that. I'm also hard at
> work to try to fix them as much as my time allows.
>
> Having said that, I'm generally very pleas
Hi Kohei and all.
Really thank you.
What can we do? support your efforts, doubling our. + + +
Miguel Ángel.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-4-2-0-Calc-bugs-tp4096889p4096970.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Le 12/02/2014 16:07, M Henri Day a écrit :
> 2014-02-12 16:08 GMT+01:00 Kohei Yoshida :
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> The amount of Calc regresssions we are dealing with in 4.2.0 is
>> overwhelming, and I don't think anyone would deny that. I'm also hard at
>> work to try to fix them as much as my time all
2014-02-12 16:08 GMT+01:00 Kohei Yoshida :
> Hi there,
>
> The amount of Calc regresssions we are dealing with in 4.2.0 is
> overwhelming, and I don't think anyone would deny that. I'm also hard at
> work to try to fix them as much as my time allows.
>
> Having said that, I'm generally very please
Hi there,
The amount of Calc regresssions we are dealing with in 4.2.0 is
overwhelming, and I don't think anyone would deny that. I'm also hard at
work to try to fix them as much as my time allows.
Having said that, I'm generally very pleased with the quality of the bug
reports we are getting. T
