On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:45:10AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
I've got the combined bibisect repository up on the test server and
I'm ready for some people to clone it, poke at it, and test it out.
Awesome! So
Ayup,
I've got the combined bibisect repository up on the test server and
I'm ready for some people to clone it, poke at it, and test it out. To
prevent overuse (and because it's easier to reuse the existing
gitolite on the server than set up a separate public git server),
please send me a public
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:58 -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's my current plan for merging all of our bibisect repos into one:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Bibisectzilla
Thank you for the summary of the state-of-play. A couple random
thoughts, if I may:
1. It
Hi folks,
Here's my current plan for merging all of our bibisect repos into one:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Bibisectzilla
Are there any other master builds in the 3.3 - 3.5 era that we can include?
Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo? Are you
still
/Libreoffice-qa-Bibisectzilla-tp4082559p4082579.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi qubit
In this server you have ALL builds for ALL OSes since 3.3.0 Beta1 until
4.0.5 and 4.1.0 (i.e until August 15th 2013)
ftp://ftp.uni-muenster.de/pub/software/LibreOffice/testing/
Are these useful?
Hi Pedro,
Any builds
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo?
No, as they are redundant to builds in the 2013-10-12 repo.
Are you still stashing daily builds in a repo?
I am not and never did daily builds.
Best,
Bjoern
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:44 PM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo?
No, as they are redundant to builds in the 2013-10-12 repo.
Roger.
Are you still
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:54:31PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
As the 4.0+ repo is currently out of commission, is anyone stashing
daily builds at this point? I'd like to avoid a gap in our bibisect
repo coverage, if possible.
I never 'stashed' build. Once enough has happened on master, would
