Hello,
I reported a bug, which is located at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65571
. However, it is marked as NEW even though no one triaged it. Can someone
resolve this?
Thanks.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Lib
. If additional
information is required it will be changed to NEEDINFO. I'm not sure what a
triager should change it to if it is confirmed... @Joel???
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Report-Incorrectly-Marked-as-NEW-tp4061545p4061555.h
it will be changed to NEEDINFO. I'm not sure what a
> triager should change it to if it is confirmed... @Joel???
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Report-Incorrectly-Marked-as-NEW
Hi Florian, *,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
>
> Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty
> problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UNCONFIRMED.
Bugs reported via the BugAssistant should be UNCONFIRMED, but the
default when creating bugs on
Hi,
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier
:
> Hi Florian, *,
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
>>
>> Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty
>> problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UN
On 06/15/2013 02:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier
:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty
problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UNCONFIRMED.
Bugs report
Hi
Am 15.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On 06/15/2013 02:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier
:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger
wrote:
Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty
problem once, but I
Hi Florian, *,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier
> :
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty
>>> problem once, but IMO all
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:41 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
>
> It should be unconfirmed as long as someone from the QA team (so
> everyone triaging) can reproduce it on his machine, preferably on a
> different OS
Well, I usually do not file a bug until I am pretty sure that I am
seeing wha
://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Report-Incorrectly-Marked-as-NEW-tp4061545p4061556.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings
Christian Lohmaier wrote (15-06-13 16:21)
bugs filed should be unconfirmed by default (but user can change to
NEW when filing a bug) (and are unconfirmed by default, at least with
my privileges)
And AFAIK every bugzilla user on fdo has "canconfirm" privileges.
In general, when I file a bug (al
11 matches
Mail list logo
