Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

to run it--currently return invalid. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugs-with-Backtrace-but-Not-Reproduced-tp4142359p4142406.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

@Joel, Think you need to share that query list for us to be able to run it--currently return invalid. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugs-with-Backtrace-but-Not-Reproduced-tp4142359p4142406.html Sent from the QA mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

Le 06/03/2015 16:00, Joel Madero a écrit : There doesn't seem to be a backtrace with bug 89628, or did I miss something ? Alex ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

Le 06/03/2015 16:00, Joel Madero a écrit : No backtrace on bug 89844 either ? Alex ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

, not by QA. Just my 2 cents. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugs-with-Backtrace-but-Not-Reproduced-tp4142359p4142374.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

Hi All, I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts about bugs that have backtraces but QA has been unable to repro. Should these just be pushed to NEW ? Currently there are 8 UNCONFIRMED crashers - at least one or two of those have backtraces but have had other members of QA say they cannot