Am 28.01.21 um 19:56 schrieb Timur Gadzo:
I'm reading about rolling release idea, and I find it awful. It just
popped up, not sure why. Yes, it's more simple to publish, but it would
ruin LO usability.
ESC meeting minutes: 2020-12-10
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2020-Dec
On 29/01/2021 19:58, William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote:
Ensuring there is no gap and the N-1 release doesn't EOL before N+2 is
released
Please read N+1 instead of N+2 obviously :P
--
William Gathoye
Hypertive volunteer for LibreOffice
Proud member of The Document Foundation
CM of LaMouette
On 28/01/2021 09:46, Michael Weghorn wrote:
Unless anybody else suggests a different way to handle this, it IMHO
certainly makes sense if you attend the ESC meeting today.
(I've added that item to the agenda for now.)
To @all
I consider this problem solved iff the agreement reached during
On 28/01/2021 11:27, Florian Effenberger wrote:
I think it is intentional that we always do have two parallel versions
available for download, but it's something that might change as we are
looking into the rolling release system, which makes this
differentiation obsolete.
Yes, exactly like
On 28/01/2021 22.03, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
LO is regression plagued product.
Yup. But honestly with the available resources, I don't see this
changing in any time-frame, I can imagine. One IMHO main problem is,
that we mainly have regression unit tests. So every change is almost
guara
Hi Timur,
Timur Gadzo schrieb am 28.01.2021 um 19:56:
On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger
mailto:flo...@documentfoundation.org>>
wrote:
>
> William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22:
>
>> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the
websit
On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger <
flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22:
>
>> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website
while the update service is redirecting users of 6.4 to the 7.0 version
Hello,
On 28/1/21 11:27, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>
>> 2. Write and ensure a check list for the release process is
>> **enforced** to ensure these use case are properly handled and the
>> TDF update service is advertising the right version with 2 days max
>> delay.
>
> The goal is to have the up
Hi William,
Cloph and Xisco can give more technical details, so just some quick
thoughts from my side before the ESC call:
William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22:
Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website
while the update service is redirecting u
On 27/01/2021 18.22, William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote:
I would like the ESC take action on a pending topic that is annoying a
bunch of users and that I have been constantly reporting for **3 years
now**[0]: desynchronization between the website and the TDF update service.
[...]
I'll be th
Hi there,
I would like the ESC take action on a pending topic that is annoying a
bunch of users and that I have been constantly reporting for **3 years
now**[0]: desynchronization between the website and the TDF update service.
See here [1] for more background info. For complains: [2], [3], n
11 matches
Mail list logo