Petr Mladek wrote
> Ah, this is not precise because I copied old dailies from the old tree
> yesterday. A better check is the build date. In a daily build from today
> or newer does not have the info, it is bug and need to be fixed.
Info in About box
Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: 08d2a6532ece
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 07. 12. 2012 v 16:29 +0100:
> Pedro píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 17:09 -0800:
> > Hi Petr
> >
> >
> > Petr Mladek wrote
> > > I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see
> > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c
Pedro píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 17:09 -0800:
> Hi Petr
>
>
> Petr Mladek wrote
> > I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe
> > I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, i
Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
> I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe
> I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux
> tinderboxes with release configur
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I am going to update tinderbox script. See the attached screenshot for
what I have in mind.
Hi Petr,
that's perfect for the daily builds.
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffic
Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
>> However I think the public Beta builds are not compiled with
>> --enable-release-builds.
>> Won't that be a problem?
>
> No, it uses a separate configure option (variable) that is going to be
> used only for the daily builds.
Excellent! Beta1 is nearly out so it is
Pedro píše v Pá 30. 11. 2012 v 11:18 -0800:
> Hi again Petr
>
>
> Petr Mladek wrote
> >> I assume the idea is that Public Betas and RC builds will not include
> >> this
> >> info either?
> >
> > Yup, it will be only in the daily builds.
>
> However I think the public Beta builds are not compile
Hi again Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
>> I assume the idea is that Public Betas and RC builds will not include
>> this
>> info either?
>
> Yup, it will be only in the daily builds.
However I think the public Beta builds are not compiled with
--enable-release-builds.
Won't that be a problem?
Petr M
Pedro píše v Čt 29. 11. 2012 v 11:39 -0800:
> Hi Petr, all
>
>
> Petr Mladek wrote
> > Note that it might take longer time because I need to test it carefully
> > to do not break all tinderboxes :-)
>
> Don't worry, a few are broken already :)
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.htm
Hi Petr, all
Petr Mladek wrote
> Note that it might take longer time because I need to test it carefully
> to do not break all tinderboxes :-)
Don't worry, a few are broken already :)
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html
Petr Mladek wrote
> You might say that I broke the nice de
Petr Mladek píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 18:01 +0100:
> Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 08:20 -0800:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
> > scheme is useless for QA people.
> >
> > (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
Hi Norbert
Norbert Thiebaud wrote
> I count 3 out of 13 that seems to have their '@' sign gobbled up that
> a far cry from 'most'...
> that being said it would be best indeed to ping the owner of these box
> to get them to fix that...
And another 2 (named W2008R2) refer to the host OS not the Ta
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Pedro wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
>
> You want to know the host it was built on ? sounds like a reasonable
> request to me - though it's somewhat unclear how that should be
> configured / propagated from machine to machine.
>
> If the Tinderbox naming followed y
Hi Rainer
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
> I have notes for every download I install
> with additional info concerning tinderbox, pull date and some info else.
> As you can see, I always contribute that info from my notes in my
> reports and comments.
Actually I also keep such a text file. But I fi
Hi Michael
You want to know the host it was built on ? sounds like a reasonable
request to me - though it's somewhat unclear how that should be
configured / propagated from machine to machine.
If the Tinderbox naming followed your own rules
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development
Pedro schrieb:
One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no
way to know if build
Hi,
yes, current incomplete Info in the about box causes some problems. Not
for me and my normal tests, I have notes for every download I install
with additional info concerning t
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:20 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
> scheme is useless for QA people.
:-)
> (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
Heh.
> One year later, after installing
Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 08:20 -0800:
> Hi all
>
> Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
> scheme is useless for QA people.
>
> (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
>
> At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme
Hi all
Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
scheme is useless for QA people.
(and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn*
mentioned a better solution
http://nabble.docume
19 matches
Mail list logo
