Hi all,
I've prepared a new run of regression tests on Moztrap [1] for the 4.0.2
RC3 due this week (not yet available).
These regression tests are simple, with step by step explanations and
expected results. If you are a new comer in testing, you'll be guided by
Moztrap (and me if you need help :
://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-tp4093033p4093323.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
oundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-tp4093033p4093593.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedeskto
Hi Pedro,
Le 23/01/2014 06:48, Pedro a écrit :
> Hi Sophie
>
> Why are the Locale languages limited to those few?
>
> Are these particularly problematic or representative? Or is it simply
> related to the number of users/collaborators?
There are no particularity with those listed, that was only
2; there is a typo
in the name of Test number 18 in English "Create a new Math do_c_ument"
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-tp4093033p4093610.html
Sent from the QA mailin
Hi Pedro,
Le 23/01/2014 09:55, Pedro a écrit :
> Hi Sophie
>
>
> sophi wrote
>> In fact, that actually has no incidence because there is no localization
>> of the tests or of the MozTrap interface available. I should better
>> remove the languages in the list than add some, that would be less
>>
binations (3 Archs, 9 Locales and 4
Platforms) it seems that testing is very inconclusive. Most tests show 2%
completion except for 4.2.0 beta2 which was EN_US only (23%)...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-t
