Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-31 Thread ape
Hi, Michael! Thanks for the tip. I guessed that this can be done, when compared extracted DEB and RPM archives in Windows. But I was not sure that it is correct. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4071907.html Sent

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-27 Thread Michael Stahl
On 21/08/13 19:39, ape wrote: > Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux), > because I use LibreOffice by TDF only. why RPM based Linux? it's easily possible to install the RPM packages on any Linux, the only thing that does not work is system integration (menu e

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-22 Thread Pedro
Hi Kendy, Thorsten, all Pedro wrote > The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+ > Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe662fe0d80601049f015d8ac > TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-08-13_21:26:14) > > worked correctly so it won't help in solving the problems that we

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-22 Thread ape
Hi, Florian! Thank you for your reply and advice. Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux), because I use LibreOffice by TDF only. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070982.html

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi, You may try this http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@6-debug/current/ For Ubuntu there is a PPA, if you are on Beta, or the the bibisect repo: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-prereleases http://flosmind.wordpress.com/libreoffice-bisecting/ Liebe Gr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread ape
Hi Kendy! Created big problems for testers program for Windows XP (my OS – Win_XP_64-bit_sp2) now: 1. "Master_@39" (master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi) does not start. LibreOffice reports that MSVCR-2012 libraries are not found. 2. “Master_@42" (ID: 63b86dfdf84edfc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread ape
I have some computers: from the "Core i3-2130" to "Xeon e3-1230v2". But I use "Windows_XP_64-bit" as the primary operating system and "*buntu\Debian_amd64 with LXDE or Mate" as educational and auxiliary operating systems. The situation is now: I don’t have the opportunity to participate in the LibO

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Pedro wrote: > None of the builds from tinderbox 39 and 42 works under Windows XP. > Sure sure, that is I suppose a general fix. Was just trying to make sure my box is not utterly broken by always doling out crashing builds. ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature _

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread Pedro
Hi Thorsten, all Thorsten Behrens wrote > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-X86@42/2013-08-19_23.11.46/ > e.g. works just fine here. In general, of course, master can be broken > (and then fixed again) at any given time... ;) > > If that still fails for you, some more input appr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-21 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > I can also confirm that the build > > libo-master~2013-08-17_22.48.29_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from > > Tinderbox 42 crashes on start. > > No idea - Thorsten? > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-X86@42/2013-08-19_23.11.46/ e.g. works just fi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-19 Thread Pedro
Hi Kendy Jan Holesovsky wrote >> I can confirm that build >> master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from >> tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses >> some >> MSVC dlls. I could but it seems to me that this is a problem specific to Tinder

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-19 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Pedro, Pedro píše v Ne 18. 08. 2013 v 13:31 -0700: > I can confirm that build > master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from > tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some > MSVC dlls. I suppose it is due to a new MSVC; but should be fi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-19 Thread Pedro
Hi Kendy, Petr, all This would be the perfect opportunity to run a debug build but the latest available is from the 13th of August, so it's probably not worth running it to check today's bugs? ape wrote The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe66

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-18 Thread Pedro
Hi Kendy, all For some odd reason this message by ape hasn't been accepted. I can confirm that build master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some MSVC dlls. I can also confirm that the build lib

[Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

2013-08-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Petr, all, Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 08. 2013 v 18:20 +0200: > Kendy, would be possible to enable uploading the daily builds from > Win-X86@39, please? Done now: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/ Should be quite reliable, the box has been stable for the last month [