Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-06-02 Thread Pedro
Kieran Peckett wrote >> > I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could >> be >> > a valuable tool for QA guys. > > Just out of interest... how? Because, unlike PortableApps, they do keep all previous versions available. This can be quite useful to find a regression. TD

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Kieran Peckett
Actually, they are: they even supply apps to help with the process see http://portableapps.com/development all the instructions are there, along with example code On 20 May 2013 19:17, "Pedro" wrote: > Hi Kieran > > > Kieran Peckett wrote > > Seeing as the Portable Version is hosted at LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 20 May 2013 20:06:20 +0200, Pedro wrote: ... Tommy wrote I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be a valuable tool for QA guys. It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in the Open Source spirit than the guys at Portabl

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Kieran Peckett
On 20 May 2013 19:06, "Pedro" wrote: > > Hi Tommy > > > Tommy wrote > > I'll try asking about the 3.6.6 > > Thanks! ;) > > > Tommy wrote > > I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be > > a valuable tool for QA guys. > Just out of interest... how? > > It is indeed.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Pedro
Hi Kieran Kieran Peckett wrote > Seeing as the Portable Version is hosted at LibreOffice rather than > SourceForge, I assume LibO devs pack it up. If that is true, then can't > someone, at least for future versions, if older versions can't be found in > anyone's "Downloads" folder keep archives o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Pedro
Hi Tommy Tommy wrote > I'll try asking about the 3.6.6 Thanks! ;) Tommy wrote > I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be > a valuable tool for QA guys. It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in the Open Source spirit than the gu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Kieran Peckett
Seeing as the Portable Version is hosted at LibreOffice rather than SourceForge, I assume LibO devs pack it up. If that is true, then can't someone, at least for future versions, if older versions can't be found in anyone's "Downloads" folder keep archives of non-"EOL" versions (like <= 3.5) around

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:57:45 +0200, Pedro wrote: Hi Tommy Now that I also have the elusive version 3.4.6 do you think you can convince them to create a portable version of 3.6.6? Actually the 3.6 branch isn't dead yet and there might be a 3.6.7 release https://wiki.documentfoundation.or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Pedro
Hi Tommy Tommy wrote > hi Pedro, look at this link... > all the X-LibO versions you asked for are available here: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/ I had already been in that folder but wrongly assumed the releases were sorted by version number (and di

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Tommy
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:00:14 +0200, Tommy wrote: this is not correct... they did the 3.3.x and 3.4.x branches as well (I'm sure because I used those versions) but probably they removed them from the website since they are very old release. If you are interested I can ask the wPP.com gu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-20 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 19 May 2013 23:06:55 +0200, Pedro wrote: Tommy wrote you should check X-LibreOffice which is an alternative portable package from winPenPack.com IMHO X-LibreOffice is much better than the PortableApps package. Thank you for the suggestion. Just downloaded and unpacked version 4.0.2

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-19 Thread Pedro
Hi Tommy, all Tommy wrote > you should check X-LibreOffice which is an alternative portable package > from winPenPack.com > > IMHO X-LibreOffice is much better than the PortableApps package. Thank you for the suggestion. Just downloaded and unpacked version 4.0.2 (for comparison) It does ha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-19 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 18 May 2013 13:47:09 +0200, Pedro wrote: ... However not all versions are available because the guys at PortableApps abandon a branch as soon as there is a release from a newer branch (e.g. the final version in the 3.5 branch is 3.5.5 so 3.5.6 and 3.5.7 were ignored) This is not ve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread Pedro
V Stuart Foote wrote > I don't see it, size on Windows OSs for current 4.1.0 builds whether /A > administrative install or full install with registry is coming in about > ~319-321 MB. Comparable to current Apache OpenOffice 4.0 betas which > average ~325 MB. Current builds are not comparable with

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread Pedro
Hi Florian reisi007 wrote >> A parallel install can be made with ANY installer so all versions are >> available. However it requires more knowledge (even using Florian >> Reisinger's SI GUI it's not trivial) and the install size is huge >> (because >> all files are unpacked) > > :) Sorry to hear

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread V Stuart Foote
reisi007 wrote >>Thanks for that info, but I meant difference between parallel install >>and portable... Sorry, misunderstood... So latest PortableApps.com build of LibreOffice (4.0.3.3 - 0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) is ~330 MB for an English install, but that can be cut to ~221MB

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi, Am 18.05.2013 um 19:03 schrieb V Stuart Foote : > reisi007 wrote Pedro-- ... and the install size is huge (because all files are unpacked) >>> BTW: Is there really a that big difference in size? > > I don't see it, size on Windows OSs for current 4.1.0 builds whether /A > administ

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread V Stuart Foote
reisi007 wrote >>> Pedro-- ... and the install size is huge (because all files are >>> unpacked) >>BTW: Is there really a that big difference in size? I don't see it, size on Windows OSs for current 4.1.0 builds whether /A administrative install or full install with registry is coming in about ~3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi Pedro, Am 18.05.2013 um 13:48 schrieb Pedro : > Hi all > > In order to test regressions it is useful to have several versions > installed. True... > > Since under Windows only one (stable) version can be installed as the > working version, the alternatives are: a Portable version or a parall

[Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?

2013-05-18 Thread Pedro
Hi all In order to test regressions it is useful to have several versions installed. Since under Windows only one (stable) version can be installed as the working version, the alternatives are: a Portable version or a parallel installation. The main advantage of the Portable version is that it i