Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-02-11 16:06, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 19:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote: Otherwise, the file is available at the URL, since we have added an alias to the web server. I see no problem with tweaking the URL in our own readme file in future at least. Patch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 19:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Otherwise, the file is available at the URL, since we have added an > alias to the web server. I see no problem with tweaking the URL in our own readme file in future at least. Patches welcome. ATB,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, Marc Paré wrote on 2013-01-28 13:54: It's the "readme" file whey you unpack the package before going through the installation process. See bugzilla [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54206] for more details. All OS installs get it, and, in all native language groups. looki

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-31 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 07:54, Marc Paré a écrit : Sorry for the double post. Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Sorry for the double post. Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all avail

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Florian Effenberger schrieb: I miss the plot on this - which readme are you talking about? ;) Hi Florian, we talk about THE readme.txt of each LibO build, with WIN I see it in the readmes folder folder, in a Dev Builds it's the only readme.txt there. CU Rainer

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all available languages and for all different public versions

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-26 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Marc Paré schrieb: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? Hi Marc, I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all available languages and for all different public versions. If we do not need su

[Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-26 Thread Marc Paré
I am trying to close this bug BUT incredibly enough this has been a problem since 2010!!! For some reason, there is a reference to a link in the Readme file -> [http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme.html] that points to an non-existing page on our site. Like it was mentioned in 2010, Sil