Rainer Bielefeld píše v Čt 25. 04. 2013 v 19:40 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> in discussions I sometimes read statements like „...formal vote next
> call”. I think here some clarification is required.
I agree that the wording is not ideal and we should improve it. The
processes are often just suggested and
Hi Rainer,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:40:07PM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> The QA call has no command of the QA community. The calls and their
> participants are not a formal entity of TDF. The only legitimation
> of the results of these calls can be that decisions are wise, well
> and compreh
I want to second virtually everything Sophie said. I do hope that you
reconsider as your are really one of the core members of our team.
What I want to say are a couple things:
a) communicating through electronic form takes some marketing skills and we
are working on this, I promise you that ever
Hi Rainer,
I am with Sophie in asking you to reconsider the decision.
Miguel Ángel
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Role-of-the-QA-calls-tp4052308p4052322.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Rainer,
I'm so sad to read that, you're a key person for QA and that's a so long
time I read and learn from your advices that I can't imagine you
leaving. Please, may I ask you to reconsider your decision, we really
want you in the project, not only in QA but as member of our project.
I'm sure
Hi,
in discussions I sometimes read statements like „...formal vote next
call”. I think here some clarification is required.
The QA call has no command of the QA community. The calls and their
participants are not a formal entity of TDF. The only legitimation of
the results of these calls c
