Hi Thorsten, Florian R.
Thorsten Behrens wrote
So feel free to poke me (one of the tinderbox admins) in the
future.
Poke :)
Could you please rename the binaries in the Master branch so that they are
named
master~2013-10-27_23.53.26_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi
like the other
On 28/10/13 17:44, Pedro wrote:
(For Florian Reisinger) In addition, a parallel install will not work (under
Windows XP Pro x86 SP3) because of a missing MSVCR110.dll
Probably the installer doesn't go through that step when doing a parallel
install?
iirc the MSVC runtime DLLs are installed
(For Florian Reisinger) In addition, a parallel install will not work (under
Windows XP Pro x86 SP3) because of a missing MSVCR110.dll
--
Install the MS_VCR_ 2012_x86 in your system.
--
View this message in context:
Pedro wrote:
Could you please rename the binaries in the Master branch so that
they are named
master~2013-10-27_23.53.26_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi
like the other tinderboxes? (i.e. remove the libo- prefix which is
redundant?)
Can look into that - out of curiosity, why does
Hi Thorsten
Thorsten Behrens wrote
Can look into that - out of curiosity, why does that matter?
Firstly it makes it easier to automate download/installation using tools
such as Florian's SI GUI and secondly because when the user is browsing for
the Master installers (files are usually sorted
Hi Michael, ape
Michael Stahl-2 wrote
iirc the MSVC runtime DLLs are installed into C:/Windows, and that does
of course not happen when doing an administrative installation with
MSI since that does not change C:/Windows.
That is what I figured. This means that parallel instals under Windows
Pedro wrote
One other request: your Tinderbox is not creating the txt files with the
build info. Unfortunately this is the only element that allows QA to know
from which TB each binary came from (before installing, obviously) so it
is quite important that it is generated with the binary...
Hi Christian
In case you haven't noticed, TB #47 is still not producing any Windows
Master binaries... The latest build was on the 15th. Two more folders were
created but they only contain the txt file...
Christian Lohmaier-2 wrote
2) Add the details of your Tinderbox to the table at
Hi, Florian
The reason for my 1st message is very simple. I use NT-5.1/2, but I do not
know which configurations should be at my computer. LibO-Dev_4.2.0
MSI-packages are used different MS_VCR (2010 and 2012), and as a result,
have different bugs.
Best regards, ape
--
View this message in
Hi ape,
Is 5.1 == XP SP3??
If so, all builds with VS2012SP1 (Which should be 39-42) shoulb be
working, don't know about 6. Anyway I guess 6 has an older version
installed...
Example --
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/current/
PS: Too many builds here!
Am
Hi Florian
Florian Reisinger wrote
PS: Too many builds here!
I guess you didn't read the original email by ape...
There AREN'T too many builds... Just too many EMPTY folders!
There AREN'T any builds NEWER than Oct 16th.
@ape, the builds from both tinderboxes (#39 and #47) work under
Hi Florian,
I've seen it. Both branches are working on NT-5.1 (XP-32bit) and NT-5.2
(XP-64bit). But @ 47 has an error Installer: try to change the folder in
which the MSI package is installed LibO-4.2.0@47.
--
ape
--
View this message in context:
Hi Pedro, *,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Florian Reisinger wrote
PS: Too many builds here!
I guess you didn't read the original email by ape...
There AREN'T too many builds... Just too many EMPTY folders!
There AREN'T any builds NEWER than Oct
Hi Christian, Thorsten, all
Thank you for the information. However some of the Windows tinderboxes
(e.g. #6 and #39) were maintained by Suse employees... Maybe someone at TDF
should handle this?
I'm re-adding Thorsten in the loop (he is the admin for #42) just in case he
missed this...
BTW
Hi Pedro,
I read some mails (I really hope, that I didn't mis one...)
Am 23.10.2013 16:28, schrieb Pedro:
Hi Florian
Florian Reisinger wrote
PS: Too many builds here!
Look at this folder:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/
Too many different builds
Hi Pedro, *,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the information. However some of the Windows tinderboxes
(e.g. #6 and #39) were maintained by Suse employees... Maybe someone at TDF
should handle this?
Nope - if the machine is no longer available,
Pedro wrote:
Regarding your question, I made a similar request over a month ago but
nobody bothered to answer... I hope someone answers to you...
Noticing now, cleaned up there.
Best course of action in the future - poke one of the tinderbox admins
(visible from the log / detailed tb info
Hi Thorsten
Thorsten Behrens wrote
Noticing now, cleaned up there.
Best course of action in the future - poke one of the tinderbox admins
(visible from the log / detailed tb info page) directly, they all have
access to that dir.
Thanks for cleaning up. But there is a deeper problem with
El 23/10/13 0:14, Pedro [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] escribió:
Regarding poking: I tried that in the past... I was either ignored or
told I was disrespectful. I'm done with that. When there are builds I
run them, when there aren't I don't. Simple :)
Best regards,
Pedro
You
Hi, all
Server at dev-builds.libreoffice.org:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
This part of the site contains many empty and outdated directories. Can
anyone from the project managers remove garbage?
--
ape
--
View this message in context:
Hi ape
ape wrote
Hi, all
Server at dev-builds.libreoffice.org:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
This part of the site contains many empty and outdated directories. Can
anyone from the project managers remove garbage?
--
ape
I think you have not signed correctly to this
21 matches
Mail list logo
