Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting tutorial

Great iniciative!! Thank you very much! El 8/1/19 a les 9:43, Ilmari Lauhakangas ha escrit: > There is now a bibisecting tutorial in the wiki: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Bibisecting_tutorial > > New contributors can take advantage of it to have a comfortable first > experie

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting post 5.0 regressions

On 30.12.2015 17:47, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > How do I bibisect bugs after 5.0 max? I don't see a 5.1 max. I see the > dbgutil version but I don't see instructions on how to use that version > nor is it entirely clear what versions it covers (is it covering 5.1 -> > master?). there are ac

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: >> >> A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of >> regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being >> the lucky one to perform the 1000th one

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

On 10/16/2015 11:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for being the lucky one to perform the 1000th one (and the 1001st one, too)! A reminder when updating a bug with infor

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

On 10/16/2015 08:29 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? >> > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. > > (CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. (CLOSED bugs make up less than 1% of the total -- we don't seem to bother taking that last st

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? Best, Joel On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > Hi all, > > A big thanks to everyone who's been helping us out with bibisection of > regressions, and a hearty congratulations to Terrence Enger for bein

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting

Hi all, unfortunately I still was too lazy to learn enough concerning bibisecting, but it would be great if those who already have some experience would do some bibisecting for Bugs where that seems useful: - LibO 3.5 or later - Reproduced for Linux I created a new Whiteboard key word *bibise

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting

On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:06:03PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > Hello Rainer, Bjoern, all, > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Rainer Bielefeld > wrote: > > has already someone tested > > successfully and can contribute a short manual on > >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting

Hello Rainer, Bjoern, all, On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > has already someone tested > successfully and can contribute a short manual on > ? Sorry for late reply, but I've test

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

Hi Nino, *, On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Nino Novak wrote: > > could you provide a md5sum of the tar package? > > I'm on slow internet and after downloading more than 7 hours I get > > nino@chef:~/liboqa/Material/bibisect> tar --lzma -xf bibisect-3.5.tar.lzma > lzma: (stdin): File format not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 20:13 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: [snip] > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=QA/HowToBibisect That is strictly for 64-bit Linux, right? Terry. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreof

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

Hi, On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:40:14AM -0800, Pedro wrote: > This is for Linux users only, right? for 3.5 yes. Once we get this integrated with the tinderboxes, we might also do this for Windows. But retroactively compiling all this on Windows for 3.5 is not feasable. However VirtualBox https://w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

Hi Bjoern, could you provide a md5sum of the tar package? I'm on slow internet and after downloading more than 7 hours I get nino@chef:~/liboqa/Material/bibisect> tar --lzma -xf bibisect-3.5.tar.lzma lzma: (stdin): File format not recognized tar: Child returned status 1 tar: Error is not recov

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

Hi Bjoern, all Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > In hope of seeing a lot of regressions marked with 'bibisected35' in the > whiteboard status. If there are questions, dont hesitate to ask! > This is for Linux users only, right? -- Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfound

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 17:00 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > This 'bibisecting' can be done by anyone, even by people with no > hacking > skills - so please, if you have a "favorite" regression in > LibreOffice, > try bibisect, and point us (developers) to when it happened - I am > sure > the bug wil

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting HowTo published on the wiki

Hi, On 2012-02-15 at 20:13 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I added a bibisecting Howto to the wiki, please try getting started with > bibisecting and report back if you are missing information on how to proceed. > And remember: Bibisecting a bug will make it much more likely that your bug > wil