Petr Mladek schrieb:
Hi all,
as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the tag
libreoffice-3-5-branch-point.
Hello,
I am a little concerned what
Hi Pedro,
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 11:46 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
> This isn't simply a matter of checking and reporting bugs. It involves
> the Quality of a product this Community claims to be Enterprise ready.
> IMO there can be NO regressions.
Having no regressions is really a feature. Th
People who think there should be zero regressions are welcome to donate the
necessary time and financial resources to
make it happen.
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 11:46 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
>> This isn't simply a matter of checking and reporting bugs. It involve
Pedro Lino píše v Pá 09. 12. 2011 v 20:34 +:
> Hi all
>
> Looking at the Release Plan chart
> http://tdfsc.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/libreoffice-versions.png
> and wiki
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
> I guess version 3.3.4 is the end of the line for family 3.3.
IMHO, comm
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 13:52 +0100:
> Petr Mladek schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the
> > 3.5.x releases, called 'libreoffice-3-5'. It is based on master, last
> > pull on December 6, 2011 at about 13pm UTC. See also the
Hi Petr
> IMHO, community can't support too many stable versions. Customers who
> need it, have to pay someone for it. We should leave 3.3 and concentrate
> on making 3.5 the best release ever.
I couldn't agree more. But someone made up this concept of "rock
solid" and "Enterprise ready". To make
Rainer Bielefeld píše v So 10. 12. 2011 v 10:56 +0100:
> Petr Mladek schrieb:
>
> > could you please do some testing with the last daily builds from the
> > libreoffice-3-5 branch? See below where to get them.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been testing for some hours doing my normal daily work without
> b
Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 16:57 +0100:
> So, I am going to use the following commits for beta1:
>
> core: 35c8573c2d544bfbc7868cb20afcb0439b4fdafc
> binfilter:7f15fcac486ea45c3ca77db7f93506850a022e5e
> dictionaries: 95bcc5e8d51b8d8e153400380d522fb603c5b894
> help: 4c
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag for 3.5.0-beta1 release.
The corresponding official builds will be available within 4 days or so.
It was delayed by few days because there were several build problems
caused by the hectic atmosphere around the feature freeze. Also we
did so
Pedro Lino píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 15:46 +:
> Hi Petr
>
> > IMHO, community can't support too many stable versions. Customers who
> > need it, have to pay someone for it. We should leave 3.3 and concentrate
> > on making 3.5 the best release ever.
>
> I couldn't agree more. But someone made
Hi all
> Would be great if somebody could check Java 7 more thoroughly, for both
> upcoming LO 3.4.5 and 3.5.
Some findings about Java 7 under Win XP Pro x86 SP3:
Uninstalled Java 6 rev 29.
Run LO 3.4.4. Executed File, Wizard, Letter. Reported missing Java
Run LOdev 3.5.0 Build ID: f923851-7f15f
Dear Sir/Madam
We are a Japanese used car export company selling Japanese used cars and
foreign cars.
We export Japanese used cars to various countries in the world. We have
extensive stocks of
Japanese used cars which satisfy your needs.We guarantee Good condition, Good
price, Quick
service. R
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag for 3.5.0-beta1 release.
> The corresponding official builds will be available within 4 days or so.
>
Mac OSX x86 build uploading now at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releas
13 matches
Mail list logo
