Re: [Libreoffice-qa] guidelines for filing bugs

2012-01-31 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:52 -0500, Terrence Enger wrote: > I wonder if it would be a good idea to say, somewhere in the > wiki pages about filing bugs, something like ... :-) I'm afraid almost everyone thinks that their problem is obvious, and that we're morons for not seeing it, or for n

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-31 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Nino, Nino Novak wrote (29-01-12 14:11) I'm just a simple user, so maybe my view is a bit naive. But my general concern/intention is to help improving LibO quality. Ah great - our whole community exists of simple users and simple developers. SO you are perfectly at the right place here :-

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-31 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Yifan Yifan Jiang wrote (30-01-12 02:44) This is a great news, thanks for sharing :) No thanks needed! Sorry that Brussels is so far away for you - would love to meet at FOSDEM. As far as I concern, Regression is our routine testing for each release, which is pretty important to make sur

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] tracking ODF compliance issues

2012-01-31 Thread Petr Mladek
Michael Stahl píše v Út 31. 01. 2012 v 14:26 +0100: > hi all, > > i'd like to have some easier way to track bugs related to ODF compliance > in the bugzilla. > > what would be the best way to do this: > - a new keyword, say "odf" or "odf_validation" > - a tracking bug, that depends on all indidua

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] preparing QA talk for FOSDEM

2012-01-31 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Nino, Thanks for the thoughts about quality. For those who use Libreoffice quite frequently, practical general usage of software is pretty valuable to find issues thus improve quality, even not that surprisingly, it some time reveals bugs we never found in testing "lab" :) I believe the regres