Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Joel, On 2012-06-15 at 23:09 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. Looking > for input. I read through email threads and see that prioritizing bugs > has been an interesting discussion but as of now looks to be pretty > unsettled. I'm going t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Joel Madero píše v Pá 15. 06. 2012 v 23:09 -0700: > I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. Looking > for input. I read through email threads and see that prioritizing bugs > has been an interesting discussion but as of now looks to be pretty > unsettled. I'm going to make a s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Čt 14. 06. 2012 v 16:40 +0200: > What about the following scheme? > > Help / AboutBugzilla Picker Info > -- > 3.6.0.0.alpha13.6.0.0.alpha1 > 3.6.0.0.beta1 3.6.0.0.beta1 > 3.6.0.0.be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting

2012-06-18 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi all, unfortunately I still was too lazy to learn enough concerning bibisecting, but it would be great if those who already have some experience would do some bibisecting for Bugs where that seems useful: - LibO 3.5 or later - Reproduced for Linux I created a new Whiteboard key word *bibise

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Joel Madero schrieb: I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. Hi Joel, great to see that all in a chart, your conclusions and definitions seem plausible. But the chart also shows the limitations of that concept: It's really sophisticated, and no developer will sit at

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Joel Madero
I'll modify the orientation today or tomorrow and try to see where regression should fit. I think that it has to go in Priority and not in Severity. As for how devs use it, I agree completely that right now it's almost useless but maybe if it becomes more uniform and it actually provides some i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 13:21 +0200: > Joel Madero schrieb: > > I brainstormed a bit today and I came up with this flowchart. > > > Hi Joel, > > great to see that all in a chart, your conclusions and definitions seem > plausible. > > But the chart also shows the limitations o

[Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Branch Version Picker items – 3

2012-06-18 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi all, I am happy to see that we have a solution for the general problem, I will change picker texts with 3.6.0.0.beta2 The remaining problem is what we will do with 3.7.0.0.alpha1+daily 3.7.0.0.alpha2+daily 3.7.0.0.beta1+ daily 3.7.0.0.beta2+ daily 3.7.1.0.alpha1+daily 3

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 07:04 -0700: > I'll modify the orientation today or tomorrow and try to see where > regression should fit. I think that it has to go in Priority and not in > Severity. Makes sense. > As for how devs use it, I agree completely that right now it's > almost u

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Branch Version Picker items – 3

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 17:16 +0200: > Hi all, > > I am happy to see that we have a solution for the general problem, I > will change picker texts with 3.6.0.0.beta2 > > The remaining problem is what we will do with Ah, I forgot this ;-) > 3.7.0.0.alpha1+daily > 3.7.0.0.a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 09:32 -0700: > Version 2, changed orientation and tried to take comments into > account. Let me know what you all think. It is much better readable. I finally got a better picture :-) Well, I think that it still need some thinking. You set "inability to safe"

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning bug list

2012-06-18 Thread Joel Madero
I agree with the save comment, I'll change that right now. Also realized I didn't put a note in for regressions so I added to the bottom notes: **Regressions** Special attention should be paid to regressions. In most cases a regression calls for an increase in priority but in some cases it will no

[Libreoffice-qa] Messages to libreoffice-qa rejected

2012-06-18 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi all, some of your messages you write as an answer to other messages are rejected, currently I can't find out why. In my details view the Subject line is scrambled, looks like "Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=5BLibreoffice-qa=5D_New_Bugzilla_?= =?windows-1252?Q?Version_Picker_items_=96_2

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

2012-06-18 Thread MiguelAngel
El 15/06/12 13:27, Petr Mladek escribió: Hi Florian, On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 10:07 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote: Hi! I am not sure anyone has seen my suggestion: Alpha 1: 3.6.0a1 Beta 1: 3.6.0b1 RC 1: 3.6.0r0 RC 2: 3.6.0r1 Ah, this does not work because we could not mention "r" (same as "r

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of the libreoffice qa call 2012-06-14

2012-06-18 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:50:37PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi all, > > here are the minutes of todays QA call. > > community building/communication (Cor?): >- beta testers for 3.6.0 beta 1 >- 3.6.0 beta 1 available in ppa (Bjoern) > - Wheres a good howto? (Florian) >