-07 at 23:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
1. If there has been a request for information and there has been no
response for 30+ days I'm putting NEEDINFO
2. If two or more people have said that they do not have the bug I'm
doing the following if there hasn't been action for 30+ days
Hi All,
Where do I upload an updated manual. I made an incredibly small change to
address a bug report that someone had:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
I've done about a paragraph addition just to address the language issue
that the user brought up. Can I send this somewhere?
.
Ok off to work. Glad it at least seems a little useful. I have such
limited experience in programming/programming projects that I just felt
a bit overwhelmed so this helped me quite a bit last night when I was
going through bugs.
Joel
On 06/18/2012 04:21 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Joel
it will
not. If the regression is not elevated to a higher priority, a comment
may be useful to explain why this decision was made
Joel
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 09:32 -0700:
Version 2, changed orientation and tried to take
otherwise.
Joel
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero píše v Út 19. 06. 2012 v 13:36 -0700:
I moved this to a new thread because the subject here didn't really
accurately portray the direction of the conversation
The mail includes many good
I try not to bug devs over these kinds of things but I came across one of
these enhancement requests that I wanted to see what everyone thought.
The request is to get IMPORT working for the software program MINDVIEW.
I feel like we should close it as WONTFIX. Reasons:
1. The software isn't free
Hi All,
Friendly discussion about if we can commit to putting a minimum version
or a since on our API documentation. We've had a user put in a bug report
(I closed as not a bug but thought it was valid anyways) that we don't
consistently -- or more accurately, rarely ever -- put a minimum version
, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:11 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I feel like we should close it as WONTFIX. Reasons:
5. Not one other user has posted on the bug since its creation 5+
months ago
request:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org
-0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I am really hesitant to support just having so many bugs floating
around like this. I think that marking as RESOLVED - WONTFIX enables
devs to look at these if they are ever inclined to do so but makes it
clear to the users that we won't be doing this.
Yup, I agree
the software is closed source and would be really difficult
to implement.
Joel
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.comwrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:35 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
One of my mein concerns is that we aren't keeping up with bug reports
so we may close a bug
30, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Joel Madero schrieb:
We could put WONTFIX with a message to the reporter that states.
Hi all,
during the last QA call we decided to do a mass close for NEEDINFO bugs
without reaction for a too long time
Hi All,
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported or are problematic in Calc. This stems from FDO 47164:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
The user has been nice enough to make a list, I can go one by one and
verify that Calc
if the goal is to convince MS Office
users that we can provide a better product than MS can.
Thanks for the feedback,
Joel
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, 2012-07-12 16:20:37 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 23:03 -0700, Joel
-07-11 15:53:07 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported or are problematic in Calc. This stems from FDO
47164:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
Taking Regina's answer this actually was about
, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Friday, 2012-07-13 09:00:28 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I closed the bug as INVALID and put a comment on there. I also will move
the list to the wiki, not sure where it's preferred to go or if I'm
making
a new wiki page
found a total of 14.
Thanks again,
Joel
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Tuesday, 2012-07-17 08:36:22 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I've started the page. You can find information on the Calc development
page (bottom). Thanks for the guidance
It's terribly located, I'll fix it today. It's on the right page but just
not very clear:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Severity
If you scroll down you'll see a link to it but it's small and not very easy
to find. Direct link is here:
Hi QA people :)
I was wondering if anyone is interested in trying to do a triaging
extravaganza in the next month or so. The main goal would be to get the
unconfirmed bugs in the proper status (New, NeedInfo, Resolved) and set
priority. Whiteboard status would be a plus but a secondary triaging
Hi All,
Do we have an ongoing list of open issues that we keep track of and up to
date? If not it might be a good idea to get one going. I think that there
are at least 3-4 things in the past couple months that have had serious
conversations but a decision was never made to finalize things. The
(GMT - 7) is hard for
me as I'm at work.
Joel
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi QA people :)
I was wondering if anyone is interested in trying to do a triaging
extravaganza in the next month or so. The main goal would be to get the
unconfirmed bugs
At what point do we put resolved as a status? Is it when it's committed to
master branch? If not then is the developer/qa team expected to continue to
check a patchs status after it's already committed to master in order to
find out if it's committed elsewhere? Thanks in advance, I'm not positive
I've never successfully figured out how I respond to a particular item in
the digest. Do I compose a new message with the subject or is there some
other method that I get on that particular messages thread? Thanks
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Hi All,
Tomorrow morning I'll be opening up an IRC room (#libreoffice-qa) at 9am
(GMT-7). Starting at 9:30 (GMT-7) we're just going to spend an hour going
through unconfirmed bugs and trying to confirm them and prioritize them. I
suspect the first 10-15 minutes will be organizational, I've
should be on the same page, including devs we may want to CC for a
particular bug.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero píše v Út 31. 07. 2012 v 07:02 -0700:
It's terribly located, I'll fix it today. It's on the right page but
just not very
will join. Thanks again everyone!
Joel
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Joel,
first, thanks a lot for organizing such an event. It is a good start in
any case.
Joel Madero píše v Po 06. 08. 2012 v 11:15 -0700:
Hi All,
Well, we attempted to do
Hi All,
As most of you know we've started a major push to triage the unconfirmed
bugs and I am going to give updates periodically for 2 reasons: 1. just so
we all know the progress :) 2. to remind people that we always need more
individuals helping out at least until we get a grasp on the 12+
for these bugs?
Thanks for your feedback, I'm glad we're making progress.
Joel
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Joel Madero schrieb:
As most of you know we've started a major push to triage the unconfirmed
bugs and I am going to give updates
the
best method please let me know what is.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Joel Madero píše v Čt 02. 08. 2012 v 14:42 -0700:
At what point do we put resolved as a status? Is it when it's
committed to master branch? If not then is the developer
produce the documentation/attachments so we can reopen them and confirm
them.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Joel!
__
Florian Reisinger
Von meinem iPad gesendet
Sent via iPad
Am 13.08.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Joel Madero
Can someone who has permissions (or if someone can give me permissions) to
access http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/qa-testers/, we need to add
the QA IRC channel (#libreoffice-qa) to the site. Thanks all
Best Regards,
Joel
___
List Name:
Hi All,
First off, sorry that I'm starting a new thread, I'm not sure how to
reply to something from the digest in gmail.
A couple days ago there was a very brief discussion about NEEDINFO and that
it wasn't very useful to have the NEEDINFO status sit for weeks or months
on end if the users
I will have to address the full thread in a few hours when I can sit
down and think a bit about this but a couple points:
a) I feel strongly that we should be actively aiming at making the
triaging a more important aspect of development and agree with Petr
that we should use priority and
Hi All,
Progress is still going for the unconfirmed bugs but we still needs people
to actively and aggressively help. If you have some time in the coming
weeks take a look at the following document:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E
If you
Hi All,
More input on this morning's conversation. Maybe an idea would be that when
we actually put a bug into NEEDINFO status we put a comment that has a
small blurb on our procedure. Something like we have put this bug in
NEEDINFO status because we need you to provide.we will leave the bug
This is only in the first phase but I'm aiming to make the triage page more
complete, easy to read, and have all the information (at least linked) to
effectively triage. Here is the link, feel free to comment, check it out
every once in awhile as I'm trying to do updates somewhat regularly:
On 08/25/2012 02:30 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Joel Madero schrieb:
when we actually put a bug into NEEDINFO status we put a comment that
has a small blurb on our procedure. Something like we have put this bug
in NEEDINFO status because we need you to provide.we will leave the
bug
, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Rainer Bielefeld píše v So 25. 08. 2012 v 11:30 +0200:
Joel Madero schrieb:
when we actually put a bug into NEEDINFO status we put a comment that
has a small blurb on our procedure. Something like we have put this
bug
in NEEDINFO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
We should come up with a better method of tracking vs. each of us making
our own list. If everyone wants, they can email me and I will keep a
combined list that we can discuss during our conference call. You can
just email me directly
Well we're 24 days into the project and there is mostly good news (although
some bad news is there as well). So bad news first.
Overall we're down only about 200 or so bugs in 24 days. This takes into
account the new bugs since 8/5 that have been filed which has been a lot.
This is also good news
On 08/29/2012 10:38 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Joel Madero schrieb:
We should come up with a better method of tracking vs. each of us making
our own list.
Hi Joel,
yes, indeed!
If everyone wants, they can email me and I will keep a
combined list that we can discuss during our conference
I just came up with a potential idea! What about making a custom search on
FDO and just share it with each other? I use a couple custom searches right
now, making them is easy, transparent and shared.
Just a thought
Best Regards,
Joel
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Joel Madero jmadero
than the chaos that is FDO :) Or maybe
I'm just not familiar enough with FDO to really feel comfortable myself
with it, this is more likely than not true :)
Best Regards,
Joel
On 09/04/2012 01:53 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Am 04.09.2012 21:52 schrieb Joel Madero:
Basically it would be really
There are 12 bugs from 2011 that haven't been triaged. I think they have
been kind of ignored because they require certain things (such as Mac or UX
input or advanced computer understanding :) ). Could someone(s) please get
these done, then at least we're up to 2012 :) If you see one or more that
PM, Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org wrote:
Am 04.09.2012 23:05 schrieb Joel Madero:
I agree that FDO has some benefits but the limitation is really that
each user
is needed to query every time, the possibility of overlap is great, and
no one
is really responsible for an individual bug until
Hi All,
Came across this bug FDO#45570 and I've already nominated as a most
annoying bug but I think that devs might appreciate me getting some kind of
a log or something together for the crash. What type of log should I create
and how do I go about doing this (basic steps, my knowledge of
I don't see that helping much, as the developer who takes this one can
quickly do this themselves. A working doc only takes 2 seconds to make.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, John Smith lbalba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joel Madero jmadero
7, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see that helping much, as the developer who takes this one can
quickly do this themselves. A working doc only takes 2 seconds to make.
Best Regards,
Joel
Another random thought then: Is there a way to reproduce
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Smith lbalba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com
wrote:
Hi John,
You can always make it easier for a developer to solve - and the
easier
it is, the more likely it is to get solved
means we should be using their time wisely, not running
backtraces that someone with 1/10th of their computer programming skills
could manage just fine.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, John Smith lbalba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Joel Madero jmadero
Masoud wraithl...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear Joel,
I'm willing to help. Where do I fit in within the QA team? You can see my
recent activity in FDO bugzilla Libreoffice bugs.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.comwrote:
Weekly update and reminder that we're still
Hi Everyone,
Michael came up with an idea for hard hacks that I liked. Here is the
proposal:
a) each QA staff member gets to nominate one bug to hard hacks at a time
b) that member monitors the bug occasionally and once it is fixed they can
put another one on the list
c) in order to track we
These are just a few of the things that pertained to QA
1. Calc (3.6) crashing
1. bugs discussed, we need to go through the Unconfirmed and verify.
The NEW ones are being looked at by the developers
2. HardHacks
1. Previous email sent out, we need to finalize the process
violated.
Best Regards,
Joel
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
Joel Madero wrote:
IMO we need to add a section to how to file a bug report that is
labeled what is not helpful or useful in there I could put
Hi,
of course you can do
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:56 AM
Subject: FDO Permissions
To: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi All,
I know that this is a touchy subject and needs a lot of discussion but, how
difficult is it to make it so you
Hi All,
Weekly update, stats, and more requesting of triagers:
Date Number of Unconfirmed Bugs 30 Days Old Average Length of Days Since
Opened Average Length of time Since Last Change Median Length of Days Since
Opened Median Length of time Since Last Change 4/9/2012 893 100 64 87 52
Hi All,
Sorry for the late notice but this is a call for hard hacks. If you have
one please reply. Hard hack should be:
1. Relatively hard ;)
2. The more users affected the better
3. CONFIRMED (please, no unconfirmed bugs)
4. If there is an included backtrace in fdo that is a +
Please
Hi Everyone,
Our bi-weekly QA conference call was postponed today. We will be holding
our next call (make up for today) on *Wed. Sep 26th - 1300UTC*
An agenda will be released as soon as possible, if you have any topics that
you'd like discussed please send them my way and we'll try to get to
#'s were down this week but we've recruited a few new people to help out so
hopefully we see an increase in activity in the next week. Date Number
of Unconfirmed Bugs 30 Days Old Average Length of Days Since Opened Average
Length of time Since Last Change Median Length of Days Since Opened
Hi All,
Weekly call for hard hacks. If you have time to go through confirmed bugs
(NEW status on FDO) and you come across one that is:
a) relatively hard to fix
b) could affect a lot of people
c) could make LibO look really bad
Please send me the FDO# by Wed. so I can get the list together for
about done with the new triage wiki, once it's done I'll make
sure to link them.
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Collaboration:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E#gid=1
Triaging Event Doodle: http://doodle.com/3tfr888ma5cgkww4
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.comwrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 08:12 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
Confirming most bugs takes no more than 3-5 minutes.
I must be doing something very wrong then. Sigh!
Nah, some can take way longer ;) I
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33302
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and
saw that we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number. I know it's strange to
celebrate bug reports but that's a pretty cool milestone as it means our
users are reporting and probably our user base is growing :)
Regards,
Joel
On 10/08/2012 01:30 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Am 08.10.2012 19:43 schrieb Joel Madero:
I just randomly did a pull on FDO of all bugs reported under LibO and saw that
we've hit the 10,000 (exactly) number.
Sure?
Isn't it just the maximum number of bugs bugzilla lets you export in a normal
query
to replace the new one while also honoring copyright from the
current page.
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings
I am unable to reproduce this bug but reporter says he can consistently.
Can I get a second check on it?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Thanks all
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice
bugs
into easy hack status but requires both QA and developers to keep track of
the list. Looking for feedback
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#New_EasyHacks.2C_Developer_Input_Required
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http
if your bug it there:*
*
*
I don't see a list aboveam I missing something?
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
the transition.
Cheers,
Jack
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
Can someone check this one out. It's pretty old and needs to either be
closed as NOTOURBUG or investigated/confirmed and addressed as it's a
crasher.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
I don't use KDE at all, otherwise I'd give it a whirl. Thanks all
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel
? There
is no 3.6.2.0 release? Just trying to understand the naming convention.
Included main mailing list and qa list
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
I need a second opinion on this one. Thanks all
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54981
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
I just wanted to confirm that just because a macro was made in Excel
doesn't mean it'll work in LibO right? And if a user is reporting a bug
against an excel macro, the correct path would be tomark as INVALID?
NOTOURBUG?
Just want some feedback.
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA
A new version has been added to bugzilla for the release of
3.6.3.2 rc
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
will be
useful.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Stats
This will be really useful when we need to report to marketing and what not
:)
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing
Today new Version 3.6.3.2 release has been added.
BSA has also been updated
Note: 3.6.3.2 rc was changed to 3.6.3.2 release because of release notes
stating they are identical
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
On 11/15/2012 07:07 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:00:05PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
Open invite to anyone wanting to join QA call. Approximately 1 hour
long If I'm
-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E
Stats:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Stats#Unconfirmed_Bugs_Reported_More_Than_30_Days_Ago
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E
For any in the US, happy Thanksgiving week :)
Regards,
Joel
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We're falling way behind again after going a couple months doing well.
We're back up to almost 1,100 bugs that haven't been
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http
On 11/28/2012 03:55 PM, Rob Snelders wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I thought that mails for the BSA always went to the QA-list. But I saw
last that the bugs for the BSA are sent to the website-list. What is
the list to discuss the BSA on?
My opinion is that
for leading this one,
Joel
P.S. Adding a few people to this one
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http
Please add anything that you would like us to discuss.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA_Call_Current_Agenda#Current_Agenda
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
I think that testing from Thursday 13 to Wednesday 19th is perfectly fine and
beta1 state looks promising for it.
Maybe we should announce this on the user list and there's a chance we
can get a few more volunteers for QA work??
Is there any plan to make a wiki page or something about the
Today a new Version 4.0.0.0.beta1 has been added to FDO. BSA has also
been updated accordingly.
Best Regards,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
Hi All,
Can we bibisect against current master? I want to get one together but
wanted to verify that this can be done.
Best Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
added
today :)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=180450query_format=advancedbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDversion=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Masterversion=4.0.0.0.alpha1version=4.0.0.0.beta1product=LibreOffice
Best Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
trickier for the most part, takes a bit of the workload
off of us for next week although I'm sure that there will be new bugs
reported against 4 in the coming days.
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name
efficiently :(
Thanks in advance, I know that this is a little off topic but I need help
immediately to get this straightened out. Using Gmail + Thunderbird
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
by Florian and Rob.I need a solution if I'm to work
efficiently :(
Thanks in advance, I know that this is a little off topic but I need help
immediately to get this straightened out. Using Gmail + Thunderbird
Regards,
Joel
--
Joel Madero
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
showing up when you use your browser to access
your email instead of using Thunderbird ?
- Is the reply in the Thunderbird or web Gmail SPAM box
just my 2$, sorry i cant be of more help here.
- John Smith.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All
Hi All,
This is an urgent one as we are starting our test week, can someone with
Windows see if they can reproduce:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58275
If we can, we'll have to come up with a plan as it may prevent a lot of
users from participating in our marathon test week.
Today a new Version 4.0.0.0 Beta 2 has been added to both Bugzilla as
well as to BSA in preparation for release of Beta 2 in the coming days.
Best Regards,
Joel
P.S.: This thread should keep you up to date, discussion if desired
please in extra threads to keep this one clear and short.
?list_id=191511query_format=advancedbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDversion=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Masterversion=4.0.0.0.alpha1version=4.0.0.0.beta1version=4.1.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Masterversion=4.0.0.0.beta2product=LibreOffice
Many thanks as always,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
to for BSA bugs, he's been fantastic at getting them taken
care of quickly. Can you link to the list that you are seeing and we'll
point him in that direction?
Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice
but be prepared to talk about the item.
Best Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org
from QA team.
Apologies for moving too quickly on this and bringing it right to dev list.
Rainer, I'll start the conversation on QA list shortly, it might move to
the next call but I think there is room for improvement here.
Best Regards,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibO QA Volunteer
jmadero
1 - 100 of 564 matches
Mail list logo
