Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] writer+calc - anchor icons ...

2011-11-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
alexander.wilms wrote: > Wouldn't it be much more convenient to use single (SVG) images > instead, or at least a vector-based set of handles? > It seems the artwork people prefer precise control over single pixel, at least for small sized icons (<256²) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpRsUAOq7GGZ.pgp Desc

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-11-01 Thread Sveinn í Felli
Hi all, Þann mán 31.okt 2011 16:05, skrifaði Michael Meeks: Hi guys, On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 15:28 +0100, Astron wrote: 5) The handles for resizing and rotating look rather dated. They should be replaced by some squares/circles filled with a nice gradient. Are they hardcoded or could the graphic

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 13:49 +, Sveinn í Felli wrote: > A bit on Bezier-curve handles in Draw: .. > There's a slight circular shadow effect on the Bezier > handles. (Is it possible that they're supposed to be > circular but are suffering from the alpha transparency bug > mentioned in the oth

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-11-01 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, Sveinn í Felli schrieb: Hi all, Þann mán 31.okt 2011 16:05, skrifaði Michael Meeks: Hi guys, On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 15:28 +0100, Astron wrote: 5) The handles for resizing and rotating look rather dated. They should be replaced by some squares/circles filled with a nice gradient. Are t

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-11-01 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, Michael Meeks schrieb: [..] I discovered how to provoke the blinking anchor as well, using ctrl-tab switches focus between the handles and makes them blink between one state and another which is interesting. That modus is needed to manipulate a drawing with only using keyboard. Th

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] writer+calc - anchor icons ...

2011-11-01 Thread Astron
Hi Michael, >        Ok - I've pushed a fix to master that nails that; we can now have > proper > 1 bit transparency in there: hopefully that'll let us make the > handles look rather prettier as a first pass. Prolly we want to split > them up to make them a uniform size too but ... Awesome! Than

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] new range name dialog proposal

2011-11-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, Let me chime in late on this.. On Monday, 2011-10-24 23:28:09 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote: > > > As far as I know, it is currently not possible to know the characters in > > > advance, because the valid characters are influenced by localization > > > settings and some other stuff. We may on

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] new range name dialog proposal

2011-11-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Christoph, On Saturday, 2011-10-29 00:55:19 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote: > * The ratio of rather simple documents (requiring 1 ... 2 s calc > time) and complex ones (> 2s calc time). I assume that the > majority of documents are rather simple ones, so the majority of >

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] new range name dialog proposal

2011-11-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Monday, 2011-10-31 00:06:20 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > pro modeless dialog: > > - modifications in the spreadsheet are possible while working with the > dialog( is that really an advantage? makes handling of the dialog much > more difficult if we for example delete a sheet and now se

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-11-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all, I feel free to add some more info ... Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 19:38 + schrieb Michael Meeks: > Hi Cor, > > On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 19:57 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > Thorsten Behrens wrote (31-10-11 18:50) > > > At some point in time, one platform wanted larger handles, while the > >

Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Keep-ratio behaviour

2011-11-01 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Thorsten, all! Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: > Michael Meeks wrote: > > Anyhow - just to split the mails up so we can reach a clear conclusion > > quicker. I love your idea to re-use "keep ratio" (it is worth checking > > if this is serialized in the file