On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 17:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
I propose to simplify this and limit the values to HAIRLINE, THIN,
MEDIUM and THICK with sensible values and map the old values to them.
This should not be such a big problem because until 3.6 at least the
UI behaved in a similar way
Hei hei!
Why do we need to keep being compatible with Microsoft Office at all?
1) Users who switch from Microsoft Office do that for a reason and they
should expect some differences!
2) Document compatibility is a great idea, but until Microsoft Office
import works well enough, there is no
On 19/11/12 10:32, Daniel Mania wrote:
Hei hei!
Why do we need to keep being compatible with Microsoft Office at all?
1) Users who switch from Microsoft Office do that for a reason and they
should expect some differences!
2) Document compatibility is a great idea, but until Microsoft
Hi Markus, Alex,
I'll implement there what the UX team defines as useful. So if you can
convince mainly Astron (as he is the one who did most of the design
and UX work at this dialog) I'll implement this.
I think that's useful, and I think we can begin putting it in the
toolbar for 4.0.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
* Second question – do we need all five icons?
+ I'd argue we could define a default for the toolbar icon (I'd pick
colour scales, personally) and use just four icons
+ we could go even further and use just one icon (the colour
