>> However, I feel lost in the current LibO Interface. Messed up functions.
No
>> obvious indicator show up by default - on the first sight.
>I don’t understand what you mean with “no obvious indicator show up by
default”.
Ribbon interface shows: Visible line and SubTitle
Good assistance to the u
Michael Meeks schrieb:
Incidentally - this is really important work ! :-) we always need new
easy-hacks, and to have lots in the area of UI improvement is really a
great way to get new UI interested hackers into the project.
Hi Michael, Mirek,
+1
My experience (I heard from those wh
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 20:18 +0100, Mirek M. wrote:
> Here are some additional EasyHacks, stemming from my discussion with Kendy:
Incidentally - this is really important work ! :-) we always need new
easy-hacks, and to have lots in the area of UI improvement is really a
great way to get ne
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> It'd be good to finally get working on LibreOffice's UI, which tends to be
> the most criticized part of LibreOffice.
> Below are some suggestions for EasyHacks -- please respond whether they fit
> under the scope of EasyHacks an
> - the "flat/monochrome icons" subject is more about *usability* than just
> aesthetic ; IMHO, it's a waste of time to just want to change icons without a
> UI evolution.
> - when you compare with Thunderbird, look how many icon are in the default
> toolbar ? 6 plus the new "menu icon" at th
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:56 AM, jie luo wrote:
> However, I feel lost in the current LibO Interface. Messed up functions. No
> obvious indicator show up by default - on the first sight.
I don’t understand what you mean with “no obvious indicator show up by default”.
> And the save icon used flo
Floppy and Box. http://user-prompt.com/about-antiquated-metaphors-in-icons/
More is worse. http://user-prompt.com/more-is-worse-about-detail-in-icons/
Both article above contains good will @ design for LibreOffice.
However, I feel lost in the current LibO Interface. Messed up functions. No
obvio