https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78035
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
*** Bug 78034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Bug 100023 depends on bug 78034, which changed state.
Bug 78034 Summary: UI - separate "per document" settings form "global" settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78034
What|Removed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||78034
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86600
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||86600
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86759
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||86759
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99563
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55592
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Bug 100023 depends on bug 78034, which changed state.
Bug 78034 Summary: UI - separate "per document" settings from "global" settings
in Tools > Options ...
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78034
What|Re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78035
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
Version|4
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99648
Bug 99648 depends on bug 82408, which changed state.
Bug 82408 Summary: Slide navigator usability improvements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82408
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99648
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||82408
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86759
--- Comment #7 from n.lederba...@tsn.at ---
I am very pleased that the work on my request is in progress. I did imagine an
icon which opens a drop-down where you can choose portrait or landscape.
I think that a quick change of the page layo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86759
--- Comment #8 from Katarina Behrens (CIB) ---
A page config panel is already available for Impress (will be in Libreoffice
5.2), so it is now only a question of making the same panel (minus some
controls) available in Draw
--
You are re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |susobhan...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86759
--- Comment #9 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> Why not have page properties at the sidebar? It's GSoC work in progress, at
> least for Writer. Assigning to the right person...
Susobhan is porting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95462
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95462
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #5)
> @ux-advise: Should the find toolbar appear in fullscreen mode?
Of course it has to. This ticket seems to be a bug on MacOS only as it works as
expec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95462
--- Comment #7 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> Of course it has to. This ticket seems to be a bug on MacOS only as it works
> as expected under Windows. And Linux most likely as well.
Guess my co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #6 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips ---
Contacted the author of appimage (
https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be worth
mentioning that the script to generate the AppImage is really easy and is
avail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #7 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #6)
> Contacted the author of appimage (
> https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be
> worth mentioning that the script to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #8 from Christian Lohmaier ---
I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just
extract the rpms using e.g.
for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i |cpio -idmv; done
and then launh LO from the opt/program/lib
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
Status|UNC
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80941
--- Comment #25 from Dan Dascalescu ---
I'm an advanced enough user to mess with dpkg and install gdebi-core in hopes
of solving the dependency hell, but I'm still stuck with a borked installation.
Details at https://bugs.documentfoundatio
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80941
--- Comment #26 from Bastián Díaz ---
I think here Flatpak help solve the problem. Gnome Software offer native
support for Flatpak packages in the next stable release
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2016-May/msg00089.html.
26 matches
Mail list logo
