https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153350
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153350
--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153971
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153971
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153350
--- Comment #4 from dolez...@cvut.cz ---
Personally I don't agree, however that doesn't matter in this case.
Heiko has a good example of where the extended editing really is needed, and
introducing the extended editing options naturally
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153350
--- Comment #3 from Dieter ---
If we donÄt have a real life use case and don't know, if anybody would use it,
I don't see a reason to implement it into LO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153350
--- Comment #2 from dolez...@cvut.cz ---
I admit I don't know format that would require the spaces, that part was more
of a speculation, however I do believe it should be possible in case someone
does need actually it. Since the marks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153952
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #1)
> We just badly need to rename that template from the idiotic "default" name
> (which lies, because it has nothing to do with what happens by default)
