https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161093
--- Comment #4 from kurt.nordb...@protonmail.com
---
This is an interesting idea, but I'm unsure of the details, particularly
exactly how to specify the "emphasis" entries. The second approach would be
cleaner, but also might mean of-pie
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #16 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
Just noting that bug 46448 has at least three duplicates that ask for the exact
same thing, making it easy to use ISO 8601 as an override of the locale's
default date format: bug 149320,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14)
Of course no! Comment 11 was only discussing comment 10, which extended the
original proposal. Why would that make the rest suddenly WFM???
--
You are r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze ---
Yes, there it is. WFM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
Right. In case of Writer, the Format list has "Additional formats" element.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161134
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
You may also enter in the formula bar ="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/";
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
Made a suggestion on bug 161093 that might solve this ticket too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #11)
> IMO the proposed checkbox is not needed, one already needs to use explicitly
> chosen formats when they create fixed-looking documents.
This would be o
