https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159737
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> > Was it really? IIANM, this font substitution is not defined by default.
>
and here in lo_documentLoadWithOptions()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> > The LO deployed crosextra Carlito <--> Calibri mapping has been functional
> > until now for interoperability with MS Office, but that is no
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
>
> What about this? :
>
> https://www.techspot.com/downloads/downloadnow/7566/
> ?evp=05d5172f044d732dc42277fe5969fca6=10967
>
It is an incomplete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
> 103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> Currently no viable "online source" for Aptos (it is cloud only licensing)
> nor for a metrically equivalent font.
What about this? :
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
I'm against installing fonts, in particular to some extra folder (see bug
103140), We should aim for "Smaller default font name list" (bug 91130) and
"make font installation optional in Windows GUI"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote ---
MS Aptos will come to a head very quickly as more MS 365 and Office 2021 users
normal.dot are moved onto that replacement Cloud font (requiring a MS login).
Currently no viable "online source" for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159921
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsDevAdvice
--- Comment #11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158101
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158101
Tex2002ans changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Tex2002ans+LibreOffice@gmai
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
Bob Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
--- Comment #10 from Bob Harvey ---
I just expect the drag handles to work if the cursor knows they are there and
changes shape to suggest they should. That's all I expect.
And if some weird interaction with the footer means they
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159921
--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote ---
Using the SB Navigator deck, or the pop-out Navigator, in default Page
mode for go-to-page movement also does a good job of keeping the view port to a
single page with a corresponding "Page x of y"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159921
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||86066
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159921
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157207
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158101
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@robley.au
--- Comment #12
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159621
--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> Missing your use
> case that requires numbers in red for positive value
Just noting that OP was asking for positive numbers in green.
But I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Martin Guy from comment #9)
> It seems like it would be a fairly simple change...
Code pointer in bug 40227 comment 9.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
--- Comment #16 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Alexander Kurakin from comment #15)
> Hm, what does the "Row Height" field mean once "Optimal Row Height" is
> checked?
It is the minimal row height. If you use "Optimal Row Height"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
--- Comment #15 from Alexander Kurakin ---
Hm, what does the "Row Height" field mean once "Optimal Row Height" is checked?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
--- Comment #14 from Regina Henschel ---
The current behavior is an unexpected result for the user. Therefore I consider
it a bug, even it might be technical correct.
I think, the problem is the attribute style:min-row-height. That is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
--- Comment #9 from Martin Guy ---
@Mike: :D I didn't know that - I didn't even know you *could* launch Word from
the command line and I doubt the devs thought any user ever would.
Before LO, it must have been the only WP in the world to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski ---
Note that it is completely incorrect that "every other word processor" does
that. One single word processor that is the most used in the world (MS Word)
doesn't. Running something like
> "C:\Program
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
Martin Guy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
An option to create a new document, without actually writing to disk, but which
would (try to) save to that name if saved from the GUI, looks ~reasonable.
Then, special handling would be needed for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
--- Comment #3 from Martin Guy ---
> what if you want to open foo.txt but mistakenly type fu.txt?
Then it will open a blank document called fu.txt and the careless user will
figure out they typed it wrong
> Some hints on how to achieve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |rayk...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda |rb.hensc...@t-online.de
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
Yes, it's a large topic and so far no volunteer was interested in the effort.
Thanks for commenting on the other ticket.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
--- Comment #12 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
Created attachment 192768
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192768=edit
sample ODT with 3 cases
OK, I thought there was no bug if one thought of it as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
--- Comment #7 from Jim Raykowski ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6)
> Got to test with the c68712d 20240224 nightly build. +w or +s
> shortcut behavior from the SB decks and buttons are much improved.
>
> Unfortunately
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159880
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
--- Comment #5 from lol ---
One problem resolved and another problem occurs.
The label "View column/row headers" is longer than "View headers" but it
describe what the function make, show or hide the column/row headers, not the
header.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
--- Comment #4 from lol ---
Created attachment 192747
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192747=edit
Header
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caolan.mcnamara@collabora.c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.8.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.me...@collabora.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|24.2.0.3 release|Inherited From OOo
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Writer |LibreOffice
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|keyboard shortcuts don't|keyboard shortcuts don't
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3)
oops s/MOD1/MOD2/
we're adding the MOD1 modifier to the existing MOD2 modifier for
forwarding
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159837
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needUITest
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurakin ---
So, is there special code that collapse the right column's cells on collapsing
the left column's cells?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159629
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845
--- Comment #3 from Adalbert Hanßen ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Separating Styles and Macros from UNO commands makes sense - and adding more
> categories for the large list too. Regarding the UI we have bug 115527
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192725
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192725=edit
Mockup
We discussed the topic in the design meeting.
While I believe simplicity means as simple as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159562
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159621
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #17 from ady ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #16)
> Instead of pointing to where the functionality can be enabled/disabled, why
> not point to the help pages for "Protect sheet" functionality instead. If
> the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jcalvin6...@yahoo.fr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
--- Comment #10 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
*** Bug 151097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suokunl...@126.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Animations: with trigger on |Animations: with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133002
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #16 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Instead of pointing to where the functionality can be enabled/disabled, why not
point to the help pages for "Protect sheet" functionality instead. If the user
is not familiar with that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #14)
> (In reply to ady from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Hubert Figuiere from comment #12)
> > > Submitted https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/163776
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #25 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192719
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192719=edit
Mockup
We discussed the topic in the design meeting.
While having a toolbar-like checkboxlist to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159621
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|LibreOffice |Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #13 from ady ---
(In reply to Hubert Figuiere from comment #12)
> Submitted https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/163776
"
This menu doesn't exist when using the tabbed UI
"
That's not true, for the nth time.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Hubert Figuiere changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |h...@figuiere.net
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Hubert Figuiere changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159562
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Writer |UI
Summary|Image
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159573
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157207
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #24 from Heiko Tietze ---
Not really flexible implemented, for instance
SfxBoolItem InsertMode SID_ATTR_INSERT
sw/source/uibase/app/swmodule.cxx
sc/source/ui/app/scdll.cxx
...
SvxInsertStatusBarControl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #23 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #22)
>
> 1. The status bar is a kind of toolbar, but a special special kind.
True, but TB in that it can only be toggled shown or hidden.
> 2. Some UNO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #22 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
Trying to embrace the simplicity and complexity at the same time... consider
the following set of potential state of affairs (which is obviously not the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #22 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
> What I can see in the current version (guess it hasnt changed), is a polygon
> and a filled polygon. For the latter you have to remove the filling to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Lucas from comment #11)
>
> This was one of the points of my proposal.
> A javaless/extensionless integration.
+1, but implemented with ability to consume and reformat to ODF using
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192658
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192658=edit
Page number dialog
Implemented for bug 86630, this should solve the issue.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kain...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192654
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192654=edit
Notebookbar
The command label (which is the menu entry) was changed in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #11 from Lucas ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10)
> If you need to explain it's not easy to understand :-)
Actually, the video is more about the programming. I programmed a mini
database/formatter and the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #11 from ady ---
@Timur,
We have different opinions. Please respect that, instead of tagging my
comments. I am confident that experience with spreadsheets tools is very
relevant here, and not all of us have the same
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #10 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Static text to explain the UI/interaction is bad per se. We could just
> remove "Select 'Protect Sheet' from..." to make the tip compliant with all
> UI variants.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #21 from Heiko Tietze ---
Statusbar items are defined in xml files like
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/uiconfig/swriter/statusbar/statusbar.xml
and look like this
So we can reasonably tweak the alignment and
1201 - 1300 of 41217 matches
Mail list logo