https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #17 from Kenneth Hanson ---
(In reply to Daniel Collins from comment #16)
> (In reply to Kenneth Hanson from comment #12)
>
> The case of column headers is a reasonable argument, thank you for that.
Happy to help :)
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #16 from Daniel Collins ---
(In reply to Kenneth Hanson from comment #12)
The case of column headers is a reasonable argument, thank you for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #14 from Eike Rathke ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11)
> Question is if there is any technical reason that vertical align top can not
> be used as a default in LibreOffice, and if formatting for
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #13 from Kenneth Hanson ---
Created attachment 143700
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=143700=edit
Example of bottom vertical alignment
Example for previous comment.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #12 from Kenneth Hanson ---
Not sure that I would call this a technical reason, but I think bottom
alignment might make sense assuming that the stereotypical spreadsheet contains
mostly simple numeric data. For example:
1.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #10)
> The current default behavior is the same as in Excel. So I wouldn't change
> that.
>
> If someone needs other default settings, it is easy to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Collins ---
So it sounds like no one can make any explanation whatsoever for why the
default behavior is as it is. If the "wrap text automatically" feature is
important enough to include, then it should have
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #7 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
(In reply to Daniel Collins from comment #6)
> "does not have any importance" is a non-argument. If it doesn't matter, then
> you shouldn't care is the default is to the top, matching standard
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Collins ---
"does not have any importance" is a non-argument. If it doesn't matter, then
you shouldn't care is the default is to the top, matching standard reading
style.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #5 from Xavier Van Wijmeersch ---
I agree with Jean Batiste Faure
use your own templates and don't force on others things they don't need
So i suggest also a WONTFIX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #4 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
Spreadsheet is primarily intended to do computations and the cells to contain
numbers. So vertical alignment does not have any importance.
So I think it is easier to create your own templates
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Collins ---
Disagree with prior comment; I don't see what particular use-case is implied
here, other than universal reading top-to-bottom. I'd be interested in seeing:
What other use case is there (in which
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbfa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118831
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
16 matches
Mail list logo
