https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
--- Comment #7 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> I tend to agree with Harald. My expectation would be that clearing a name
> inserts the default (ShapeX with X for the first not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
--- Comment #6 from Harald Koester ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #5)
> Hi, it seems, that I was not clear enough. My uses case, that you have a
> drawing, that is used inside text as sign or ersatz for missing glyphs.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel ---
Hi, it seems, that I was not clear enough. My uses case, that you have a
drawing, that is used inside text as sign or ersatz for missing glyphs. Such
occur in writing guides and the same shape
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
--- Comment #4 from Harald Koester ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2)
> There might be no name by purpose. For example you generate a "Table of
> Figures" from object name and do not want this drawing object to be included
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
I tend to agree with Harald. My expectation would be that clearing a name
inserts the default (ShapeX with X for the first not existing number).
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2)
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122477
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de,
