https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
CC|libreo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
--- Comment #8 from Walter Tuvell ---
As for references, Google for "sequence of symbols used for footnotes". When I
did this just now, the first 4 hits showed 4 different sequences for the
"standard/suggested" (LO's hard-coded sequence m
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
My opinion:
Yes, some footnote reference mechanisms have auto-progression/numbering. But -
some do not; and that may be sufficient for justifying this feature - even as a
more general implementation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113072
--- Comment #4 from Heiko
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hstryes...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsDevAdvice
CC
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEva
11 matches
Mail list logo
