https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6)
> It would be a different bug though.
Clearly not. You should describe a use case and a workflow but not ask for a
specific solution (unless you implement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> If the requirement "Move To Top/Bottom" is valid I'd prefer to have it in
> the context menu along with Move Up/Down.
Hmmm. I didn't even think about
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
If the requirement "Move To Top/Bottom" is valid I'd prefer to have it in the
context menu along with Move Up/Down. Until now the context menu does not
provide these options. As for the space consider
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #3)
> I personally like drag and drop as alternative to the use of buttons for
> sorting animations.. unsure if this bug report being the proper place to
> mention
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #3 from Telesto ---
I personally like drag and drop as alternative to the use of buttons for
sorting animations.. unsure if this bug report being the proper place to
mention this..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> No, there is no requirement.
I didn't suggest there's a requirement - it would be a convenience feature.
Trade-off is a little bit more clutter vs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151345
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
