[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.o

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #15 from Christian Lohmaier --- *THIS* is about portable, continuing ramblings about *OTHER* bugs won't change anything. And you can write bullshit about "dependency problems" as much as you want, but fact is that LibreOffice

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #14 from Bastián Díaz --- (In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #12) > that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by > TDF without dependency hell. If you already had LO, you can install upda

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #13 from Bastián Díaz --- (In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #10) I see that you have not answered my question is it has nothing to say about it? > the point is not about a linux version in general, Again Bug 80941

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #12 from Christian Lohmaier --- that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by TDF without dependency hell. If you already had LO, you can install update. Even if you never had LO installed, the base

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #11 from Hans Deragon --- Users want to use the latest version on Linux without requiring to go to the terminal and try to fix dependency hell. They simply want to fetch the latest version from http://www.libreoffice.org and g

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #10 from Christian Lohmaier --- the point is not about a linux version in general, but about a portable version. Why would you need a portable version of LibreOffice for linux? Chanches are that if you're using linux, you can j

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #9 from Bastián Díaz --- (In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #8) > I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just > extract the rpms using e.g. > > for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i |cpio -idm

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #8 from Christian Lohmaier --- I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just extract the rpms using e.g. for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i |cpio -idmv; done and then launh LO from the opt/program/lib

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #7 from Bastián Díaz --- (In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #6) > Contacted the author of appimage ( > https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be > worth mentioning that the script to

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #6 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips --- Contacted the author of appimage ( https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be worth mentioning that the script to generate the AppImage is really easy and is avail

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WOR

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #4 from Bastián Díaz --- (In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #3) > Seems this will be solved with Flatpak. > > http://www.libreoffice.org/download/flatpak/ Flatpak is nice and is an alternative distribution system,

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@nouenoff.nl Version|5

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW See Also|

[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269 --- Comment #1 from Michael Stahl --- basically this already exists, on any GNU/Linux system you can use the "install" script included in the RPM instset to install in any directory, no root privileges required. -- You are receiving this