Michael
are you seriously trying to say that you think that the current border
UI ... is clean or intuitive for the user and we shouldn't think
about improving that ?
No sorry, that should be changed. And I agree that it is a good idea to
make things look similar to MSO, _if_ it has to be
On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 17:44 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
I propose to simplify this and limit the values to HAIRLINE, THIN,
MEDIUM and THICK with sensible values and map the old values to them.
This should not be such a big problem because until 3.6 at least the
UI behaved in a similar way
Hei hei!
Why do we need to keep being compatible with Microsoft Office at all?
1) Users who switch from Microsoft Office do that for a reason and they
should expect some differences!
2) Document compatibility is a great idea, but until Microsoft Office
import works well enough, there is no
On 19/11/12 10:32, Daniel Mania wrote:
Hei hei!
Why do we need to keep being compatible with Microsoft Office at all?
1) Users who switch from Microsoft Office do that for a reason and they
should expect some differences!
2) Document compatibility is a great idea, but until Microsoft
Hey,
currently we have a large set of problems around borders that are to a
big deal caused by our too complex border behavior. In several bugs I
already mentioned that IMHO the only sane solution is to limit the
border width to maybe 3 or 4 different values that we can both control
in the view
On 18/11/12 12:52, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey,
currently we have a large set of problems around borders that are to a
big deal caused by our too complex border behavior. In several bugs I
already mentioned that IMHO the only sane solution is to limit the
border width to maybe 3 or 4
