Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 18:39:52 Adam Bolte napisał(a):
> On 20/05/13 02:04, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> > On 19/05/13 16:50, systemsaviour.com wrote:
> >> On 20/05/13 01:08, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote:
> >>> Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:39:57 Michael Dorrington napisał(a):
> On
Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 22:11:06 Thomas Harding napisał(a):
> Le 19/05/2013 15:40, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak a écrit :
> >>> How can we get the FSF to recognise this and so change the licence it
> >>> uses for its manuals to be a free one?
> >>
> >> This is one historical point of disagreemen
Le 19/05/2013 15:40, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak a écrit :
>>> How can we get the FSF to recognise this and so change the licence it
>>> uses for its manuals to be a free one?
>> This is one historical point of disagreement between
>> Debian(FSGuidelines)/FSF,
>> and has been highly discussed. Unfortun
On 20/05/13 02:04, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> On 19/05/13 16:50, systemsaviour.com wrote:
>> On 20/05/13 01:08, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote:
>>> Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:39:57 Michael Dorrington napisał(a):
On 19/05/13 14:20, Thomas Harding wrote:
> Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael
On 19/05/13 16:50, systemsaviour.com wrote:
> On 20/05/13 01:08, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote:
>> Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:39:57 Michael Dorrington napisał(a):
>>> On 19/05/13 14:20, Thomas Harding wrote:
Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
[...]
>> Ask and ye shall rec
On 20/05/13 01:08, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote:
> Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:39:57 Michael Dorrington napisał(a):
>> On 19/05/13 14:20, Thomas Harding wrote:
>>> Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
>> [...]
>>
How can we get the FSF to recognise this and so change the li
Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:39:57 Michael Dorrington napisał(a):
> On 19/05/13 14:20, Thomas Harding wrote:
> > Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
> [...]
>
> >> How can we get the FSF to recognise this and so change the licence it
> >> uses for its manuals to be a free one?
>
On 19/05/13 22:52, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> I posted in December 2012 and January 2013 to this list about how
> including manuals which are under the GFDL with Invariant Sections or
> other unmodifiable parts (which is similar to a CC with ND licence) in a
> distribution makes that distribution
Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 15:20:25 Thomas Harding napisał(a):
> Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
> > I posted in December 2012 and January 2013 to this list about how
> > including manuals which are under the GFDL with Invariant Sections or
> > other unmodifiable parts (which
On 19/05/13 14:20, Thomas Harding wrote:
> Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
[...]
>> How can we get the FSF to recognise this and so change the licence it
>> uses for its manuals to be a free one?
>>
>>
> This is one historical point of disagreement between
> Debian(FSGuidelines)/F
Le 19/05/2013 14:52, Michael Dorrington a écrit :
> I posted in December 2012 and January 2013 to this list about how
> including manuals which are under the GFDL with Invariant Sections or
> other unmodifiable parts (which is similar to a CC with ND licence) in a
> distribution makes that distribu
On 11/05/13 11:31, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
> El 10/05/13 16:16, Fabian Rodriguez escribió:
>>
>> but I believe publishing under a Creative Commons licence
>> wouldn't be considered free, specially if there is a "non-commercial"
>> use restriction. Perhaps other can provide a better opinion here.
>
2013/5/19 Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak
> Dnia sobota, 18 maja 2013 o 00:03:41 Manuel Palomo Duarte napisał(a):
> > As I understand the interest of Linux.com (ergo Linux Foundation) is
> > promoting Linux in all its applications and uses. Of course, preferring
> > those related to freedom, but linux is
Dnia piątek, 17 maja 2013 o 21:16:12 Ted Smith napisał(a):
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 19:16 +0200, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I find this... disconcerting:
> > http://www.linux.com/news/friday-funnies/the-iron-penguin-part-2
> >
> > I understand that Google Glass is a Linux
Dnia sobota, 18 maja 2013 o 00:03:41 Manuel Palomo Duarte napisał(a):
> As I understand the interest of Linux.com (ergo Linux Foundation) is
> promoting Linux in all its applications and uses. Of course, preferring
> those related to freedom, but linux is just linux
I strongly disagree with that.
Dnia sobota, 18 maja 2013 o 13:50:38 lluvia_li...@lavabit.com napisał(a):
> I know very little about law, but I believe that licenses should be chosen
> for limiting the sensitive uses which you don't want to agree, not
> avoiding those uses that are clearly not sensitive or can be punished by
> ot
Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 04:39:36 Carlos Solís napisał(a):
> "Quiliro Ordóñez" escribió:
> >El 15/05/13 10:16, Will Rico escribió:
> >> GNU and FSF promote the use of CC By-ND, so at least by their
> >> definition, this license can be considered "free" under the
> >> appropriate circumstance
17 matches
Mail list logo
