It's another category of hardware if anything. I hope it won't be
as proprietary and closed down as the smartphone market is
currently.
>>>
>>> Hardware is not really the issue, in my opinion. The Oculus Rift,
>>> for example, is a relatively simple device. A smartphone can be
>>> ba
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 18:01 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> Sure, my point is that I don't think the associations people have
> with "App" are any worse than "Website" given that most websites
> people actually use are crappy, filled with ads, tracking,
> proprietary JavaScript… I don't think there's
On 03/03/2016 05:59 PM, Kip Warner wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 11:34 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> I appreciate the intention, but I find this proposal misguided. App
>> is just short for Application, and F-droid "Apps" are fine other than
>> broader issues about the Android ecosystem. Nobody has
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 11:34 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> I appreciate the intention, but I find this proposal misguided. App
> is just short for Application, and F-droid "Apps" are fine other than
> broader issues about the Android ecosystem. Nobody has a trademark on
> the term App, so it's *not* l
> On 03 Mar 2016, at 09:56, Fabio Pesari wrote:
>
> I think at some point there will be a global VR network, and since
> companies like Facebook and Google already invested heavily in VR, they
> will be the ones setting the rules.
Hi,
When I was 17 years longtime ago 1990 there was a French und
I appreciate the intention, but I find this proposal misguided. App is
just short for Application, and F-droid "Apps" are fine other than
broader issues about the Android ecosystem. Nobody has a trademark on
the term App, so it's *not* like "Kleenex". The problems with Apps in
general are not about
On 03/03/16 01:22 PM, Kip Warner wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I've been reading this list for quite some time and enjoy seeing the
> dialogue. I'd like to propose an addition to the "Words to Avoid (or
> Use with Care) Because They Are Loaded or Confusing" page here:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/philoso
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:00:12AM +0100, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 10:25 AM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
> > It's another category of hardware if anything. I hope it won't be as
> > proprietary and closed down as the smartphone market is currently.
>
> Hardware is not really the issue, in my opi
On 03/03/2016 10:25 AM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
> It's another category of hardware if anything. I hope it won't be as
> proprietary and closed down as the smartphone market is currently.
Hardware is not really the issue, in my opinion. The Oculus Rift, for
example, is a relatively simple device. A sm
> I think at some point there will be a global VR network, and since
> companies like Facebook and Google already invested heavily in VR,
> they will be the ones setting the rules.
I don't think there will be a separate VR network, just VR headsets
communicating over the regular Internet.
> Virtu
http://ur1.ca/olhtv
This chilling image of Mark Zuckerberg made me think about the impact of
Virtual Reality (VR) on user freedom.
I think at some point there will be a global VR network, and since
companies like Facebook and Google already invested heavily in VR, they
will be the ones setting th
11 matches
Mail list logo
