Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Article on GRSecurity, RMS, etc.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Shawn wrote: > I'm not an expert of GPL compliance. I personally don't see any GPL > violation in PaX/Grsecurity. Because of some embedded vendors pissed > off PaX/Grsecurity's authors last year and then they decided stable > patch was going to

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Article on GRSecurity, RMS, etc.

It's all for naught on x86 however: both the Intel chipset and the AMD are backdoored (as we've known for years). ARM is also backdoored. What does that leave? Elbrus from Russia (for 7k a pop) and Leemote from China? It would be nice if an honest country would disregard the patents and just

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Article on GRSecurity, RMS, etc.

I'm not an expert of GPL compliance. I personally don't see any GPL violation in PaX/Grsecurity. Because of some embedded vendors pissed off PaX/Grsecurity's authors last year and then they decided stable patch was going to customer-only, which means you could get the source code once you paid.