On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:39:13PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
> mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
> *itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
> dependency on the LG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Context:
https://libreboot.org/news/unity.html
https://libreboot.org/news/proposal-rejoin-gnu.html
Main discussion thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/libreboot/comments/66tdds/proposal_for_libreboo
t_rejoin_gnu_community/
Thoughts are welcomed.
LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required
mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work
*itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple
dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or
compatible license (unless if stati
Perhaps we can make the part of Savane (the software that GNU Savannah
uses, which seems to also provide the web interface) that makes that
page available, although this will probably introduce some level of
complexity, and possibly even the need for separate databases.
I was thinking, and perhaps
