On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 20:44:56 -0500, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> I don't see this as a problem. I see this as a feature: I have no problem
> filing the list emails into a folder and reading them when I have time. I
> subscribe to multiple lists and I do this quite successfully across them all
> usin
I would be open to setting up a public-inbox mirror for this
and other GNU lists(*).
The most notable instance is the one I run for the git project:
https://public-inbox.org/git/
All the code is AGPL-3.0+ and designed for low-end hardware
(both client and server): git clone https://publi
Connor Doherty wrote:
* Mailman, the software usually used for mailing lists, shows its age,
with an unnecessarily clunky, under-designed web interface.
Two big good things about Mailman 2's web interface: it's optional (one can
do mailing list management via email) and it doesn't require Ja
Hey John!
1) The answer is no, I haven't, but if you knew about that, what prevents you
from upgrading? (Not that I think it's any better than Discourse.)
2) I had a feeling it was for more than groups, but I have yet to see it used
for anything else in a way that is (inarguably) successful. Reg
A couple quick things:
1) have you looked at Mailman 3? Has web forum features.
2) mission of wiki is not just geographic groups. Maybe we need to make that
clearer. It's also intended, and has been used for, a space to collaborate
around issues and actions.
___
For new coders, non-coders, and in general everyone who is not an
older/established member or prospective member of our community, the structure
for communication is seems antiquated at best, daunting and inaccessible at
worst. Resources are fragmented among multiple sites, poorly optimized for
