On 3/12/20 9:56 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Félicien Pillot, 11/03/20 23:05:
>> What's wrong??
>
> ninhar has raised such topics earlier in the Replicant mailing list,
> see for instance:
> https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/replicant/2019-November/002268.html
>
> "Report from 36C3" is
On 3/12/20 6:43 AM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 20:10:09 +0100, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
>>
I resend the emails replying to purism why does fsf and libreboot
embrace a misleading company? under the
subject purism why does fsf and libreplanet embrace a misleading company?
That seemed not to work. This is a test email.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
On 3/11/20 11:10 PM, Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>I'm not really sure how Purism is any worse than companies like Think
>Penguin, or than the machines are any less freedom respecting than
>anything else that can run a FSF endorsed distro and coreboot. Even
>some new
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:44:59 +
Paul Sutton wrote:
> On 12/03/2020 19:39, Brendan Kidwell wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, at 14:48, Paul Sutton wrote:
> >> Am I right in thinking that the timings listed on the FSF website
> >> are US eastern time ? So that a start time of 10am equates to
On 3/11/20 9:11 PM, Stanisława Pałętka wrote:
> W dniu środa, 11 marca 2020 a via libreplanet-discuss <
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> napisał(a):
>
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
>>
On 3/12/20 5:25 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 2020-03-11 14:33, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> My post is about getting official comments from
>> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
>> reply, but I already know how people attempt
>> to defend purism's behavior.
>>
>>
>> On 3/11/20 8:48
On 3/12/20 5:25 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 2020-03-11 14:33, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> My post is about getting official comments from
>> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
>> reply, but I already know how people attempt
>> to defend purism's behavior.
>>
>>
>> On 3/11/20 8:48
On 3/11/20 11:30 PM, Hector Espinoza wrote:
>In my opinion moving in one step from all closed source to all open
>source freedom respecting is very hard or practically impossible. I am
>happy people are doing steps towards all open source and no hidden
>stuff. One valid step is
On 3/11/20 9:11 PM, Stanisława Pałętka wrote:
> W dniu środa, 11 marca 2020 a via libreplanet-discuss <
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> napisał(a):
>
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
>>
On 3/11/20 10:58 PM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> If I understand correctly...
>>
>> First, you criticise Purism for saying that soon they would be supported
>> by the FSF.
>> Then, you criticise the FSF for having supported Purism soon after that.
>>
>> What's wrong??
>
> I am criticizing
On 3/11/20 10:33 PM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> My post is about getting official comments from
> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
> reply, but I already know how people attempt
> to defend purism's behavior.
>
>
> On 3/11/20 8:48 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> If I understand you
On 3/11/20 8:48 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, you believe: Purism marketing talks about
> software freedom and the goal of RYF 100% free hardware, but they don't
> deliver to that level, and they minimize or hide the details. You worry
> that people buy Purism products
13 matches
Mail list logo
