Re: Suppression of speech in this list > Was: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms

2021-05-03 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 210502-12:28-0400, Greg Farough wrote: > On Sun, May 02 2021, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > The messages from me (and from Jorge, IIRC) did start to be posted normally > > on > > the list only after Jorge asked about dropped messages on > > libreplanet-discuss > > to sysadmin [at] gnu.org [*], an

Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project

2021-05-03 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Jean Louis wrote: [...] Was it me who started split of the GNU project and presented it on this GNU mailing list? Or was it you? On a minor note, there seems to be some confusion here: the discussion was started by "Andreas R. ", while you are replying to "Andreas Enge " on this branch.

Re: obtaining source with Guix (was: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project)

2021-05-03 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer
Arun Isaac wrote: In general, I don't find it easy to find source code for package "hello". Don't know what you're talking about. It's very easy to get source code for a package. For example, $ guix build -S hello While we are drifting off-topic for this list, perhaps a more user-fr

Re: obtaining source with Guix (was: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project)

2021-05-03 Thread Jean Louis
I hope you get the point that when there is binary package on HTTP, that such requires clear note where is the source regardless of what user does with package manager. Downloader need not use the package manager. I hope you understand it. But even if package manager is used, the binary package i