Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-15 Thread Crazytoon
El 15/06/16 a las 04:26, coadde escribió: > On 06/15/2016 04:23 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote: >>> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote: Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant sections, what do you think? >>> >>> +1,

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread Crazytoon
El 10/06/16 a las 05:56, coadde escribió: > On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400, >>> Richard Stallman wrote: > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name >

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread Crazytoon
El 10/06/16 a las 04:36, André Silva escribió: > On 06/10/2016 04:34 AM, coadde wrote: >> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>> Would you be happy (not feel disrespected) if we were to write the >>> following? >> >> Why are you saying "we"? it is your opinion, not me. You can not speak

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread Crazytoon
El 09/06/16 a las 20:46, André Silva escribió: > On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >>> >>> In