Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

On the one hand, I've never experienced the Free software community as caring very much about corporate correctness (I say corporate because this is a far cry from political correctness), which for some people can be very refreshing. Some of us got really fed up with Windows and looked for other

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

On 09/10/2016 02:16 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > It's dangerous as in the danger of someone not understanding and also > because the reader/listener can think that he doesn't need to act > against PayPal, he would think that he only needs to worry about > "PayEnemy". Suppose he has a PayPal

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

On 09/10/2016 01:35 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > About sarcasm with company/software/service names: > > **Personally**, I think it's dangerous to use these. If you need to say > the original name, just say it. There is a context in which I support > and use this sarcasm (as long as it's

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

t;the sky is blue" but I'll leave that to the reader to decide. I hope that when understood in context, this all makes more sense. IngeGNUe

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

I just want to point out that who said what to whom is being mixed up, and the timing of what was said is also getting a bit jumbled. As a result, I can't respond to what John and Georgia have said. I suggest re-reading. Serge cleared up some of it. Anyways, have a good weekend everyone.

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] PayEnemy Sarcasm

On 09/08/2016 01:53 AM, Serge Hooge wrote: >> Sarcasm and humour don't translate well in a mailing list. And on an >> international list like LibrePlanet cultural differences and language >> differences make sly digs potentially offensive, never mind that it >> completely defeats good

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 79, Issue 9

happy to be brutal with their feedback, especially towards the giant corporations that they have an uneasy relationship with. I wouldn't be surprised if the company gets hate mail! We might assume it's happened as long as the company has been around, yet all the negative feedback has never knocked them down. Since no one has yet shown themselves to be offended by "PayEnemy", I do not see a need to be proactive about protecting from alleged harm. In seriousness, if someone does not understand, they can ask. They did, and people were happy to clarify. No one is shamed for not understanding. Part of the joke is that it's a initially a puzzle. And now that the meaning has been revealed, we can all share this little joke with our friends, family and coworkers. That's my opinion, anyway. IngeGNUe

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Aseprite is now proprietary software

On 09/07/2016 01:23 PM, Serge Hooge wrote: > >> What is PayEnemy? A Free/Libre implementation of PayPal? Do you have a >> link? > > I am pretty sure it's just a tongue and cheek twist of PayPal. > Yup. Muahahaha :D

[libreplanet-discuss] RiseUp needs our help...

I've seen people using RiseUp before, so I hope that this reaches enough eyes. It's not like we're all using alternatives to email yet. So help 'em out! And spread the word, CC on relevant lists, etc. Forwarded Message [en] English - Riseup financial update [de] Deutsch -

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Aseprite is now proprietary software

On 09/05/2016 01:00 AM, jade...@openmailbox.org wrote: > I agree completely. The only way for free culture and software to be > profitable is by making supporting developers as easy as possible. When you > make donations easy, they're more likely to happen. Right now there are too > many hoops

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] EOMA68 Reached it's Funding Goal! w00t w00t!

On 08/26/2016 12:38 PM, Logan Streondj wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hey libre lovers, great news! > > EOMA68 has reached its funding target :-D. > > It's time to laugh, dance, jump and be merry. > > Just remember to keep the money for only project purposes. >

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

On 06/16/16 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Quoting part of a statement

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Article on GRSecurity, RMS, etc.

l system admin does > it all by hand, every time" > Yea, 100s of changes, by hand, every time. > > So the anti-systemd distros are just a smoke screen. > > Everything is falling apart. > > The free-software ideals have been abandoned. > > June 8 2016 1

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] secushare + gnunet

On 06/01/16 13:36, ng0 wrote: > On 2016-05-28(09:02:06-0400), IngeGNUe wrote: >> This free software project needs some love. It is the only one that with >> GNUnet is addressing the problem of Sibyl attacks on DHT >> (http://secushare.org/anonymity) and it is being built usin

[libreplanet-discuss] secushare + gnunet

This free software project needs some love. It is the only one that with GNUnet is addressing the problem of Sibyl attacks on DHT (http://secushare.org/anonymity) and it is being built using gnunet + PSYC. I love the detailed documentation and the long-term thinking about how to build a truly good

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] programming language package manager

the system > should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so on." > > > have fun and be free > ali miracle > > 2016-04-04 14:47 جرينتش-07:00, IngeGNUe <ingeg...@riseup.net>: >> On 04/03/16 18:37, Felipe Sanches wrote: >>> I've been

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] programming language package manager

On 04/03/16 18:37, Felipe Sanches wrote: > I've been concerned for a while about this as well. > Any idea if anyone has ever tried dealing with this problem already? > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Ali Abdul Ghani > wrote: >> Most of us use Package manager to install

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Equivalent of GPLv3 for hardware???

u are essentially putting all of that into the "prior art" realm, > which would prevent others from patenting it? Would this work to attain > the equivalent of copyleft for hardware? > > IngeGNUe also mentioned releasing the hardware under CC BY-SA, which is > ess

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Equivalent of GPLv3 for hardware???

On 03/30/16 07:23, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote: > Hello, > > First of all, I acknowledge this list is mainly about free software, but > I believe hardware is closely related so I am risking a question about > it here. If there's a better place for this question, please accept my > apologies and let me