Thanks for posting this, David.
On 16/02/2017 11:33, David Hirst wrote:
> This article, published under a cc licence, so freely available,
> criticises “free” software and not providing incentives to make it
> robust enough and easy enough for clinical use. The conversation is not
> peer-reviewed,
On 19/03/2016 18:24, John Sullivan wrote:
> Coming soon! :)
+1 - looking forward to it
On 28/02/2016 12:50, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Okay, here's an initial proposal just to get the ball rolling:
>>
>> - An index page titled something like "Common arguments and responses"
>> - Sub-pages of that page that follow a common template:
>> -- Title: a critique, always in quotes
>> -- A one
Hi. Thanks to Fabio for initiating this thread.
On 27/02/2016 22:46, Michael Lamb wrote:
> I apologize that I turned this into a disorganized ramble.
+1 for the disorganized ramble.
In particular, I also have mixed feelings about @nayafia's polemic. It
would be good to see a reasoned analysis f
Hi Zak, Aaron.
Zak - you probably found this already, but a good place for anyone
interested in learning UX is:
https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed
The interaction design foundation charge for their online courses, but
the E
On 04/11/2015 08:12, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
El 4 de noviembre de 2015 05:16:10 GMT+00:00, Koz Ross
escribió:
I want to publish a book, in digital form, which will be licensed
GPLv3+.
As Andrés said - other copyleft licenses may be more appropriate.
Charles Stross' Accelerando is publ
Great links! I wondered where hypothes.is has gotten to.
J.
On 22 Mar 2015 11:10, "Tobias Platen" wrote:
>
>
> On 22.03.2015 15:58, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> http://hypothes.is/ is worth checking out
>>
>> On 03/22/2015 09:41 AM, klez wrote:
