> In the predicament when the doctor's office offers "zoom" for
> teleconferencing with patients from home what can a somewhat informed
> patient suggest instead of "zoom"
You can simple recommend to use alternatives, like Jitsi. Although, I
think you should do with common sense in mind.
I'm slow
> The second criticism is kind of a sign of the times if you think about it.
> 30 years ago when GPL there was the big war of us versus them. And evil
> corporations and all of that stuff. Not that these dangerous corporations
> don't exist now of course. The danger of corporations is more than eve
> I just checked, and indeed the Software Freedom Conservancy has a list of
> supported projects. Is that what you're referring to? However, it's not
> clear to me if those projects represent diverse and successful models of
> financial sustainability.
Yeah, I don't really know if such a list exis
> That's really cool! I knew that sourcehut is aiming to be a fully free
> replacement for platforms like GitHub, but had wrongly assumed it to use a
> permissive license. One more good example of a business around copyleft free
> software (maybe we should keep a list!)
Yeah, that's a good idea ac
> I'm letting you know that there is now a Free Software Logo ready to use
> for everybody wanting to have a sign that says "Free Software"
Interesting... How did you come up with that design?
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@lib
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:08:32PM +0330, Ali Reza Hayati wrote:
> Much of this, as you said, is the problem of unjust laws that are
> affecting software. For example, my country, Iran, is under U.S.
> sanctions. As a result, GitHub and GitLab are blocking us and banning
> our accounts.
>
> For ev
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 10:23:51AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira via
libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> Em 31/10/2020 04:57, Jean Louis escreveu:
> > I have not verified each system distribution and I do not think that
> > the approach to simply remove packages that could go to non-free
> > repositories
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:03:07AM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> Mastodon, GNU Social, Pleroma or any federated social network can
> become centralized with a lot of money. Once user base is gained, the
> network can be centralized. Both Google and Facebook users could
> communicate back in time throu
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:00:28PM +0100, Óscar wrote:
> Hi. Here a newbie!
>
> This is a inquiry about Chromebooks to the community.
>
> Recently, the public school that my 9-year-old daughter attends has
> imposed on us the acquisition of a certain Chromebook.
>
> I have not found any articles
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:58:08AM -0500, Don Saklad wrote:
> What email can folks try that's in harmony with principles of
> Libre software and like gmail isn't stored locally?
If you are question other options of email services, I would say that
you either have two options.
Host yourself, which
What's wrong with Creative Commons?
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:48:03AM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Pedro Lucas Porcellis [2021-04-10 06:36]:
> > What's wrong with Creative Commons?
>
> There is no general Creative Commons license. You have to be
> specific. There are many various Creative Commons licenses
software activism".
Best regards,
Pedro Lucas Porcellis
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 09:18:16AM -0300, Jorge P. de Morais Neto via
libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> Hi. I am part of a few Google Groups mailing lists and I would like to
> move further away from G$$gle. Do you recommend an inexpensive (note
> that the Brazilian Real is very undervalued against t
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:26:11AM -0700, fischersfr...@sent.at wrote:
> My great and good friends,
>
> Every local COVID-19 testing option that I have looked at requires me
> to run proprietary software if I am to take the test. Inconveniently,
> the testing providers don't say this clearly, so i
Do we? Isn't a lot of other people available which can offer the same level of
guidance as RMS? Hasn't the man spoken a lot over all those years?
If we don't, then I think there's much more to evaluate other than him
*needing* to be on the list of speakers.
_
16 matches
Mail list logo
