Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-07 Thread Andres
El 6 de febrero de 2016 16:31:50 GMT+00:00, Fabio Pesari escribió: On 02/06/2016 04:06 PM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: trisquel 7.0 does not do it AFAIK. Trisquel does not distribute programs that have what F-Droid calls "antifeatures", AFAIK, except perhaps those which support external ser

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 02/06/2016 04:06 PM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: > trisquel 7.0 does not do it AFAIK. Trisquel does not distribute programs that have what F-Droid calls "antifeatures", AFAIK, except perhaps those which support external services like Pidgin (but do not require any nonfree software or assets) a

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
El 6 de febrero de 2016 13:19:30 GMT+00:00, Fabio Pesari escribió: >On 02/06/2016 01:29 PM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: >> >> I just realized that there isn't a distro package manager that does >this either. nor do package managers warn you about antifeatures. OK >desktops and laptops are not as

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Daniel Martí
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:27:05 +0100, Fabio Pesari wrote: > I think that at the very least, F-Droid should distribute the fully free > programs from their main repository and if they really want to offer > programs with "Antifeatures", they should be distributed from a separate > repository that

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 02/06/2016 01:29 PM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: > > I just realized that there isn't a distro package manager that does this > either. nor do package managers warn you about antifeatures. OK desktops and > laptops are not as transportable as mobile and Tablets. Of course there isn't - this

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 02/06/2016 01:18 PM, Daniel Martí wrote: > > Anti-feature filtering is the way to do this: > > https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/issues/564 > > Multiple repos is not only harder to use and maintain, but also more > limited. You can either show all apps with anti-features, or none of > th

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 02/06/2016 01:15 PM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote: > Agreed, it is a good idea, sounds easy to me like a user. But I bet it is > difficult to do and maintan. the gaurdian project repo is maintained by the > gaurdian group AFAIK. who would want to maintain an Anti-feature repo? > already sounds

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
El 6 de febrero de 2016 12:15:55 GMT+00:00, "Andrés Muñiz Piniella" escribió: >El 6 de febrero de 2016 11:27:05 GMT+00:00, Fabio Pesari > escribió: >>F-Droid is great for finding libre Android programs, however I do have >>an issue with their inclusion policy, and in particular their >>acceptance

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella
El 6 de febrero de 2016 11:27:05 GMT+00:00, Fabio Pesari escribió: >F-Droid is great for finding libre Android programs, however I do have >an issue with their inclusion policy, and in particular their >acceptance >of "Antifeatures": > >https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures > >I disagree wit

[libreplanet-discuss] F-Droid's Antifeatures

2016-02-06 Thread Fabio Pesari
F-Droid is great for finding libre Android programs, however I do have an issue with their inclusion policy, and in particular their acceptance of "Antifeatures": https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Antifeatures I disagree with all of those compromises (except "Upstream Non-free", since they patch thei