On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:24:36PM +1200, Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
>> Hi Cascardo,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> Your explanation makes sense.
>> I think I have to looked into see how NZ Consumer
Hi Cascardo,
Thanks for the reply.
Your explanation makes sense.
I think I have to looked into see how NZ Consumer Guarantees act applies
to goods and services distributed for free.
Cheers,
Kesara
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 08:12:12PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:24:36PM +1200, Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
> Hi Cascardo,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> Your explanation makes sense.
> I think I have to looked into see how NZ Consumer Guarantees act applies
> to goods and services distributed for free.
>
See Part 5, Section 41
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
>
> Can the “Consumer Guarantees acts" like these affect the original authors,
> even though they didn't sell the software?
I have not read the exact law, but I would imagine, at the very least, if
the original authors are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
In one of the talks [1] on 2016 Kiwi PyCon (New Zealand's annual Python
conference) [2], the presenter mentioned that GNU GPL's "Disclaimer of
Warranty" is invalid against New Zealand consumer guarantee act [3] which
offers warranty