I would take this blockage of outbound traffic on 80 and 443 one step
further, free speech is one thing, but the other effect is interstate
and international commerce is being randomly restricted by what is now
essentially a utility provider. While the Internet was in it's infancy,
it was not a
That's obviously stupid, as any malware deposit on any location would
provide same effect.
No MIM is needed, that's as exactly as Threatened(trusted) Computing.
Le 01/05/2017 à 20:39, Kees Epema a écrit :
In my opinion there are other solutions for ISP's to prevent malware/viruses
than
In my opinion there are other solutions for ISP's to prevent malware/viruses
than blocking port 80.
Maybe these ISP's only support https on 443? Regarding privacy concerns over
unencrypted protocols like port 80, that seems to me no bad policy.
One of the main reason for existence of ISP's is
What are people's opinions on this? ISPs block 80 on consumer internet
connections purportedly to prevent the spread of malware and viruses. I
think it is in infringement on free speech. I have had ISPs in Hawaii
and Missouri where this isn't done and you are free to run your web
server on
