Connor Doherty wrote:
> Feel free to do whatever you like with that regard - my
> proposal is unrelated since your software has no GUI, which
> would be a step in the opposite direction from my post.
>
> Sorry, but my eyes glazed over when I clicked that link.
> Candidly, I
after all.
But to each his own. Cheers!
From: Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:00:20 PM
To: Connor Doherty
Cc: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Modernizing the Libreplanet Community
Infrastruct
I have used a site that had Discourse some time ago (1 year ago), and I
noticed one problem with it, at least when I tried it, it didn't provide
me, the site visitor, the software freedom regarding the JavaScript
being provided to me.
Also, another issue is: usage of the service provider's
On 06/21/2017 05:42 AM, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:31:56PM +0200, John Sullivan wrote:
>> A couple quick things:
>>
>> 1) have you looked at Mailman 3? Has web forum features.
>>
>
> Mailman3 remains a mailing list software with a Web interface.
>
> What you can gain
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:31:56PM +0200, John Sullivan wrote:
> A couple quick things:
>
> 1) have you looked at Mailman 3? Has web forum features.
>
Mailman3 remains a mailing list software with a Web interface.
What you can gain with Discourse is a lot more interesting:
- you can split and
I would be open to setting up a public-inbox mirror for this
and other GNU lists(*).
The most notable instance is the one I run for the git project:
https://public-inbox.org/git/
All the code is AGPL-3.0+ and designed for low-end hardware
(both client and server): git clone
;
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 5:31:56 PM
To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org; Connor Doherty
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Modernizing the Libreplanet Community
Infrastructure
A couple quick things:
1) have you looked at Mailman 3? Has web forum features.
2) mission of wiki is no
A couple quick things:
1) have you looked at Mailman 3? Has web forum features.
2) mission of wiki is not just geographic groups. Maybe we need to make that
clearer. It's also intended, and has been used for, a space to collaborate
around issues and actions.
For new coders, non-coders, and in general everyone who is not an
older/established member or prospective member of our community, the structure
for communication is seems antiquated at best, daunting and inaccessible at
worst. Resources are fragmented among multiple sites, poorly optimized for